2016
DOI: 10.5935/ambiencia.2016.04.01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of land surface phenology of land cover types on the Flooding Pampa (Argentina): an approach using NDVI time series

Abstract: ResumenEn la Pampa Deprimida los trabajos que analizan la dinámica y el funcionamiento de la vegetación se realizan en una escala de mayor detalle y en tiempos cortos. La teledetección ha facilitado el estudio de la dinámica y comportamiento fenológico de la vegetación a partir de índices espectrales específicos, capaces de abarcar diferentes escalas espacio-temporales. Los objetivos de este trabajo son analizar y caracterizar la dinámica fenológica de las coberturas vegetales más representativas de la Pampa D… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This produces a higher difference between maximum and minimum NDVI values than in grasslands. On the other hand, sown pastures have less cover variability throughout the growing season, which produces a similar difference between NDVI maximum and minimum values than in grasslands (Lara and Gandini, 2016b). We found a higher seasonality in the south and southwestern regions, where annual crops and double-cropping systems are dominant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…This produces a higher difference between maximum and minimum NDVI values than in grasslands. On the other hand, sown pastures have less cover variability throughout the growing season, which produces a similar difference between NDVI maximum and minimum values than in grasslands (Lara and Gandini, 2016b). We found a higher seasonality in the south and southwestern regions, where annual crops and double-cropping systems are dominant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%