While the low cost and strong safety record of lead-acid batteries make them an appealing option compared to lithium-ion technologies for stationary storage, they can be rapidly degraded by the extended periods of high rate, partial state-of-charge operation required in such applications. Degradation occurs primarily through a process called hard sulfation, where large PbSO 4 crystals are formed on the negative battery plates, hindering charge acceptance and reducing battery capacity. Various researchers have found that the addition of some forms of excess carbon to the negative active mass in lead-acid batteries can mitigate hard sulfation, but the mechanism through which this is accomplished is unclear. In this work, the effect of carbon composition and morphology was explored by characterizing four discrete types of carbon additives, then evaluating their effect when added to the negative electrodes within a traditional valve-regulated lead-acid battery design. The cycle life for the carbon modified cells was significantly larger than an unmodified control, with cells containing a mixture of graphitic carbon and carbon black yielding the greatest improvement. The carbons also impacted other electrochemical aspects of the battery (e.g., float current, capacity, etc.) as well as physical characteristics of the negative active mass, such as the specific surface area. Valve-regulated lead-acid (VRLA) batteries are a mature rechargeable energy storage technology. Low initial cost, well-established manufacturing base, proven safety record, and exceptional recycling efficiency make VRLA batteries a popular choice for emerging energy storage needs.1,2 VRLA batteries are employed in stationary storage applications such as: utility ancillary regulation services, wind farm energy smoothing, and solar photovoltaic energy smoothing.3 Stationary applications may require short duration, high-rate, and partial state-of-charge cycling (HRPSoC). 4 Under HRPSoC duty, conventional VRLA cells fail prematurely from irreversible PbSO 4 formation within the negative plates.5 Regular cycling to 100% state-of-charge (SoC) mitigates PbSO 4 crystal formation and growth. However, regularly cycling to 100% SoC is not viable for many stationary storage applications. Large PbSO 4 crystals are not easily reduced back to metallic lead during HRPSoC charging, reducing cycle life. Reduced cycle life of VRLA batteries increases the operating cost, thereby limiting their practicality for stationary applications.VRLA battery HRPSoC cycle life can be increased with carbon modification of the negative active material (NAM).6-10 Adding carbon to the negative plate inhibits PbSO 4 crystal formation and/or limits PbSO 4 crystal growth.11-13 The underlying mechanism responsible for reducing PbSO 4 formation/accumulation is dependent on the size of the PbSO 4 crystallites. Controlling PbSO 4 microstructure has been found to be difficult while maintaining low cost. Other methods exist to limit PbSO 4 crystal size; including utilization of a carbon honeyco...