2018
DOI: 10.3934/era.2018.25.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Log-convex decay in non-selfadjoint dynamics

Abstract: The short-time and global behaviour are studied for autonomous linear evolution equations defined by generators of uniformly bounded holomorphic semigroups in a Hilbert space. A general criterion for log-convexity in time of the norm of the solution is treated. Strict decrease and differentiability at the initial time results, with a derivative controlled by the lower bound of the negative generator, which is proved strictly accretive with equal numerical and spectral abscissas.2010 Mathematics Subject Classif… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1], cf. details on the counter-example in Lemma 3.1 and Remark 3 in [17]). A local version for the Laplacian on R n was given by Rauch [25,Cor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1], cf. details on the counter-example in Lemma 3.1 and Remark 3 in [17]). A local version for the Laplacian on R n was given by Rauch [25,Cor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of e −(T −t)A and the integral over [0, T ], condition (20) clearly involves nonlocal operators in both space and time as an inconvenient aspect -which is exacerbated by the abstract domain D(e TA ) that for longer lengths T of the time interval gives increasingly stricter conditions; cf. (17).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1]; cf. the details in Lemma 3.1 and Remark 3 in [20]). A local version for the Laplacian on R n was given by Rauch [27,Cor.…”
Section: Preliminaries: Injectivity Of Analytic Semigroupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(15) Whilst this holds if A is self-adjoint or normal, it was emphasized in [5] that it suffices that A is just hyponormal (i.e., D(A) ⊂ D(A * ) and |Ax| ≥ |A * x| for x ∈ D(A), following Janas [18]). Recently this was followed up by the author in [20], where the stronger logarithmic convexity of h(t) was proved equivalent to the formally weaker property of A that, for x ∈ D(A 2 ),…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst this holds if A is self-adjoint or normal, it was emphasized in [CJ18a] that it suffices that A is just hyponormal (i.e., D(A) ⊂ D(A * ) and |Ax| ≥ |A * x| for x ∈ D(A), following Janas [Jan94]). Recently this was followed up by the author in [Joh18], where the stronger logarithmic convexity of h(t) was proved equivalent to the formally weaker property of A that, for x ∈ D(A 2 ),…”
Section: Theorem 3 ([Joh19b]mentioning
confidence: 99%