2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.10.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of mechanical properties and fracture mode of additively manufactured carbon fiber and glass fiber reinforced thermoplastics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

15
293
2
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 451 publications
(312 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
15
293
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The electrical conductivity of tar‐based carbon fibers is approximately three times greater than copper. In addition, carbon fibers occupy an important place in aerospace industry because of its lightweight, low density, high impact strength, low coefficient friction and vibration damping …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electrical conductivity of tar‐based carbon fibers is approximately three times greater than copper. In addition, carbon fibers occupy an important place in aerospace industry because of its lightweight, low density, high impact strength, low coefficient friction and vibration damping …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Goh et al reported a comparison of fracture behaviors between 3D‐printed carbon and glass FRPC. The results showed that fracture behavior of tensile and quasistatic indentation tests between continuous carbon and continuous glass FRPC is similar, while fracture behavior of flexural test is different . In addition to the above two inorganic fibers, natural plant fiber is also applied to 3D‐printed FRPC gradually.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results showed that fracture behavior of tensile and quasistatic indentation tests between continuous carbon and continuous glass FRPC is similar, while fracture behavior of flexural test is different. 29 In addition to the above two inorganic fibers, natural plant fiber is also applied to 3D-printed FRPC gradually. Matsuzaki et al developed a method of in-nozzle impregnation for 3D printing of continuous FRPC and found that the tensile properties of 3D-printed carbon FRPC were much better than that of 3D-printed natural jute FRPC.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This enhanced manufacturing technology would make it possible to reinforce the components only in the regions and in relation to the most requested directions according to their application in use. This feature can be achieved using reduced diameter yarn filaments, which will be deposited solely according to the most requested orientations, allowing it to produce micro reinforcements, as well as larger areas of reinforcement [39]. With this purpose, a prototype system was designed, built and tested and it is presented in the next section.…”
Section: Additive Manufacturing By Filamentary Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%