2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0927-7757(00)00678-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of metal ion interactions with chitosan by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

18
136
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 319 publications
(156 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
18
136
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The copper sorption is followed by a charge transfer from nitrogen to copper, resulting in a higher binding energy peak of N 1s. A similar finding was reported on the adsorption of copper onto a chitosan [28]. The binding energy of the N 1s peak assigned to -NH 2 and/or -NH groups decreases in the tetracycline-loaded chitosan, while it increases significantly in Cu-or tetracycline/Cu-loaded chitosans.…”
Section: X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopysupporting
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The copper sorption is followed by a charge transfer from nitrogen to copper, resulting in a higher binding energy peak of N 1s. A similar finding was reported on the adsorption of copper onto a chitosan [28]. The binding energy of the N 1s peak assigned to -NH 2 and/or -NH groups decreases in the tetracycline-loaded chitosan, while it increases significantly in Cu-or tetracycline/Cu-loaded chitosans.…”
Section: X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopysupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This indicates the existence of copper on the chitosan after the adsorption. Similar findings were reported for such copper compounds as Cu 2 O (932.1 eV), CuO (933.5 eV), and CuSO 4 Á5H 2 O (935.1 eV) [28,32]. The binding energies are 934.89 ± 0.3 and 933.6 eV for CuCO 3 and Cu(OH) 2 , respectively [33].…”
Section: X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopysupporting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the binding ability of chitosan for copper ions was mainly due to the amine groups which were served as coordination sites for the sequestration of copper ion. [27] At lower pH, most of the amine groups in the chitosan segments was protonated and not available for copper uptaking by chelation. Thus, the values of the adsorption capacity decreased with decreasing pH.…”
Section: Adsorption Capability For Copper Ionmentioning
confidence: 99%