2007
DOI: 10.1063/1.2711815
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of metamorphic InxAl1−xAs∕GaAs buffer layers using reciprocal space mapping

Abstract: The depth profiles of metamorphic In x Al 1−x As ͑0.05Ͻ x Ͻ 1͒ buffer layers grown on GaAs substrates were characterized using the x-ray reciprocal space mapping. Three types of metamorphic samples were investigated and compared: step grade, single-slope linear grade, and dual-slope linear grade. The lattice mismatch, residual strain, crystallographic tilt, tilt azimuth, and the full width at half maximum were obtained from the reciprocal space maps. The tilt angle of linearly graded buffer layers stayed low a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
17
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
6
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The tilt behavior was also controlled by the grading style. In a study on In x Al 1 À x As buffer layers grown on (100) GaAs substrates by MBE, Lee et al [22] found that tilt increased more strongly with composition in step-graded layers when compared with continuously-graded layers, similar to results in the present study. The stronger tilting of the step-graded samples relative to the continuously-graded samples might be due the larger, discrete increases in strain during growth of the structure.…”
Section: ]supporting
confidence: 93%
“…The tilt behavior was also controlled by the grading style. In a study on In x Al 1 À x As buffer layers grown on (100) GaAs substrates by MBE, Lee et al [22] found that tilt increased more strongly with composition in step-graded layers when compared with continuously-graded layers, similar to results in the present study. The stronger tilting of the step-graded samples relative to the continuously-graded samples might be due the larger, discrete increases in strain during growth of the structure.…”
Section: ]supporting
confidence: 93%
“…We note that results similar to those shown in Fig. 3a were obtained in [2]. It can also be noted in Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Diffraction reflection curves measured in the ω-scanning mode (ω is varied, 2θ = 2θ B = const, θ B is the Bragg angle for a particular epitaxial layer) carry information about the layer mosaicity [1]. Maps of X-ray scattering at a sample (in angular coordinates or in reciprocal space) not only combine the advantages of diffraction reflection curves in the modes of θ/2θ-and ω-scanning, but also carry fundamentally new information about a sample's crystal structure, in particular about the misorientation of epitaxial layers with respect to each other [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported that high resolution X-ray diffraction (XRD) is an accurate tool for measuring the strain relaxation through the position of diffraction peaks in reciprocal space mapping (RSM). XRD-RSM is also a good method to investigate the crystallographic quality of epitaxial layers through diffraction peak analysis, such as layer tilting [4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%