2000
DOI: 10.1007/s001220051499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of microsatellite markers in peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

25
176
6
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 294 publications
(213 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
25
176
6
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The standard protocol was modified by using 40 ml of NaOH and 95 ml of Tris buffer for each sample. Samples were genotyped at six microsatellite loci that were originally developed for Prunus avium and Prunus persica: UDP97-403 (Cipriani et al, 1999), P12A02 (Sosinski et al, 2000), BPPCT-002 (Dirlewanger et al, 2002), UDP96-005 and UDP98-410 (Schueler et al, 2003), and EMPaS06 (Vaughan and Russell, 2004). …”
Section: Molecular Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard protocol was modified by using 40 ml of NaOH and 95 ml of Tris buffer for each sample. Samples were genotyped at six microsatellite loci that were originally developed for Prunus avium and Prunus persica: UDP97-403 (Cipriani et al, 1999), P12A02 (Sosinski et al, 2000), BPPCT-002 (Dirlewanger et al, 2002), UDP96-005 and UDP98-410 (Schueler et al, 2003), and EMPaS06 (Vaughan and Russell, 2004). …”
Section: Molecular Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method could certainly visualize the variations of both two S-alleles, which respective individuals possess, implying that null alleles are unlikely to be detected at the S-locus. Genotypes at 11 nuclear SSR loci, BPPCT005, 014, 026, 028, 034, 037, 038 and 040 (Dirlewanger et al, 2002), UDP96-001 (Cipriani et al, 1999), UDP98-412 (Testolin et al, 2000) and pchcms5 (Sosinski et al, 2000), were also scored using the method described by Kato et al (2011). Part of the genotypes had been already determined in our previous studies (Kato and Mukai, 2004;Kato et al, 2007Kato et al, , 2011.…”
Section: Genotyping Samples At the S-locus And Ssr Locimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genomic DNA from all the plant material was isolated according to Hormaza (2002). For the SSR analysis, the parental genotypes were initially screened with eight SSR loci previously developed in peach by Cipriani et al (1999) and Sosinski et al (2000), that have already been shown to be conserved in apricot (Hormaza, 2002) and Myrobalan (Serrano et al, 2002) genotypes: pchgms2, UDP96-003, UDP96-005, UDP96-008, UDP96-018, UDP98-405, UDP98-406 and UDP98-409. Three SSR loci (pchgms2, UDP96-003 and UDP96-008), polymorphic among the parental genotypes, were selected to confirm the hybrid origin of progeny.…”
Section: Progeny Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, microsatellites or simple sequence repeats (SSRs) have become the markers of choice for fingerprinting and paternity analyses in most plant species (Gupta & Varshney, 2000) due to their high polymorphism, codominancy and reproducibility. Over 100 microsatellite markers have been so far reported in peach (Cipriani et al, 1999;Testolin et al, 2000;Sosinski et al, 2000;Aranzana et al, 2002Aranzana et al, , 2003Dirlewanger et al, 2002) and many of them are transferable to other related species (Hormaza, 2002;Wünsch & Hormaza, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%