2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11105-015-0928-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Molecular and Physiological Responses Under Water Deficit of Genetically Modified Soybean Plants Overexpressing the AtAREB1 Transcription Factor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
31
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The constitutive promoter 35S has been frequently used in the control of gene expression and, for a long time, was associated with plant growth retardation in the absence of stress (Liu et al 1998;Kasuga et al 1999;Kasuga et al 2004;Morran et al 2011). However, in soybean, under water deficit, Marinho et al (2015) worked with GM soybean plants overexpressing the transcription factor AtAREB1 under the control of CaMV35S promoter observed that, at the end of the experimental period, there were no differences regarding root dry matter, leaf blade dry matter, and total leaf area when plants were compared under well-watered and WD conditions, indicating that such a promoter can be successfully used to obtain GM soybean plants with no growth retardation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The constitutive promoter 35S has been frequently used in the control of gene expression and, for a long time, was associated with plant growth retardation in the absence of stress (Liu et al 1998;Kasuga et al 1999;Kasuga et al 2004;Morran et al 2011). However, in soybean, under water deficit, Marinho et al (2015) worked with GM soybean plants overexpressing the transcription factor AtAREB1 under the control of CaMV35S promoter observed that, at the end of the experimental period, there were no differences regarding root dry matter, leaf blade dry matter, and total leaf area when plants were compared under well-watered and WD conditions, indicating that such a promoter can be successfully used to obtain GM soybean plants with no growth retardation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water deficit is considered the main abiotic stress that limits agricultural production worldwide (Inman-Bamber and Smith 2005). This stress often causes molecular, biochemical and physiological modifications (Marinho et al 2016;Boughalleb et al 2016;Pereira et al 2016) that negatively affect metabolism (Perlikowski et al 2016), reducing the growth and development (Mansori et al 2015), as well as the crop yield . Water limitations reduce the water potential (Fernandes-Silva et al 2016), lower the photosynthetic activity (Bertolli et al 2012), affect stomatal closing (Spinelli et al 2016), affect the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (Yi et al 2016), cause cell damages (Toscano et al 2016) and depending on the exposure time and intensity, can cause plant death (Chaves et al 2003;Shao et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The isoline best performance, comparing to BR16 plants, is related to the decrease of stomatal conductance and transpiration. Those results suggest that the transgenic genotype improved capability to handle drought, without loss of yield ( Figure 4) (Marinho et al, 2016). In the coming years, Embrapa will make available to the soybean market, new cultivars with drought tolerance technology already inserted in the materials.…”
Section: Embrapa Technology For Drought Tolerancementioning
confidence: 93%
“…These genes allow the plant to receive and to identify environmental signals of abiotic stress, activating and regulating the genetic expression (Barbosa et al, 2012). Promising results are found in Arabidopsis (Fujita et al, 2005) and soybean (Marinho et al, 2016).…”
Section: Technologies In Trial Phasementioning
confidence: 99%