1996
DOI: 10.3354/dao027161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of mucosal immunity in rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss challenged with infectious hematopoietic necrosis virus:identification of antiviral activity

Abstract: Cutaneous and lower gastromtestinal (GI) tract mucus of rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mylclss were evaluated for inlmunological responses followvlg exposure to infectious hematopoietic necrosis w u s (IHNV) Juvenlle rainbow trout (mean weight 5 4 g) were infected w~t h IHNV (isolate 220-90) by waterborne exposure to 104 plaque formmg u n~t s (pfu) m1 ' or by a n inlection challenge of 104 pfu fish-' Cutaneous mucus and lower G1 tract washings were analyzed for vuus neutrahzing achvity (antiviral achvlty) usmg a c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, we compared injection and immersion challenges to independently assess the within-host replication and viral entry traits. Our assumption was that injection bypassed the host entry stage of the virus by skirting skin mucosal defenses, an important component of the fish immune system (12). This assumption is supported by findings that injection challenges typically induce higher levels of mortality than immersion challenges in rainbow trout (12,35,45,48).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Likewise, we compared injection and immersion challenges to independently assess the within-host replication and viral entry traits. Our assumption was that injection bypassed the host entry stage of the virus by skirting skin mucosal defenses, an important component of the fish immune system (12). This assumption is supported by findings that injection challenges typically induce higher levels of mortality than immersion challenges in rainbow trout (12,35,45,48).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Our assumption was that injection bypassed the host entry stage of the virus by skirting skin mucosal defenses, an important component of the fish immune system (12). This assumption is supported by findings that injection challenges typically induce higher levels of mortality than immersion challenges in rainbow trout (12,35,45,48). However, the work presented here did not examine cellular entry, which is a completely separate phenomenon based largely on viral receptors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Cain (Cain et al, 1996) was able to detect low anti-IHNV (infectious hematopoietic necrosis virus) activity in gut mucus of juvenile rainbow trout following immersion with this virus. Interestingly, neutralising activity was also present in gut mucus following injection challenge but titers were lower than in the waterborne challenge.…”
Section: Mucosal Immune Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of these studies examined mucosal responses after infection with infectious hematopoietic necrosis virus (IHNV). The authors observed that mucosal Igs were not important for the protection of the animal, as neutralizing antibodies were not detected in the skin, or gut mucus, while IgM neutralizing antibodies were observed in serum (Cain et al, 1996). On the other hand, innate functions of B cells, such as phagocytosis (Li et al, 2006; Zhang et al, 2010) and cytokine production (Takizawa et al, 2013), has not yet been studied during viral infection in teleosts.…”
Section: Mucosal B Cell Responses In Gutmentioning
confidence: 99%