2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2019.109912
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of myeloid-derived suppressor cells and cytokines GM-CSF, IL-10 and MCP-1 in dogs with malignant melanoma receiving a GD3-based immunotherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Serum PGE 2 , IL-12p40, IL-8, MCP-1, and SCF concentrations were higher in dogs with OMM than healthy controls, providing clues to the immunological changes associated with tumorigenesis and progression of OMM, including resistance to endogenous antitumor mechanisms. These findings are consistent with previous reports showing elevated serum IL-12p40 in osteosarcoma 42 , IL-8 in mammary tumor and osteosarcoma 42 44 , and MCP-1 in lymphoma, histiocytic sarcoma, urothelial carcinoma, and malignant melanoma 45 49 compared to healthy dogs. Upregulation of these factors may reflect immunological responses in the tumor microenvironment, but the cellular and locoregional sources of these factors remain to be investigated.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Serum PGE 2 , IL-12p40, IL-8, MCP-1, and SCF concentrations were higher in dogs with OMM than healthy controls, providing clues to the immunological changes associated with tumorigenesis and progression of OMM, including resistance to endogenous antitumor mechanisms. These findings are consistent with previous reports showing elevated serum IL-12p40 in osteosarcoma 42 , IL-8 in mammary tumor and osteosarcoma 42 44 , and MCP-1 in lymphoma, histiocytic sarcoma, urothelial carcinoma, and malignant melanoma 45 49 compared to healthy dogs. Upregulation of these factors may reflect immunological responses in the tumor microenvironment, but the cellular and locoregional sources of these factors remain to be investigated.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…As G-CSF, GM-CSF, MCP-1, and TNFα are known to be important cytokines for recruitment of MDSCs [33][34][35], we then examined the recruitment of MDSCs in vivo. FACS analysis showed that, more G-MDSCs were recruited in mice injected with 1601 cells than those injected with 1601-ko-Ptges cells (8.0% vs 2.8% in WT mice; and 10.7% vs 6.4% in Gprc5a-ko mice), and more G-MDSCs were recruited in Gprc5a-ko mice than in C57-WT ones (10.7% vs 8.0% for 1601 cells; and 6.4% vs 2.8% for 1601-ko-Ptges cells) (Fig.…”
Section: Ptges/pge 2 -Mediated Recruitment Of Mdscs Is Essential For mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mucha et al reported an MDSC frequency of 18% in dogs with neoplasms with metastases, and 0.25% in healthy dogs ( 30 ). Other studies that characterized the subpopulations of (M)-MDSCs and (PMN)-MDSCs used different methodologies, such as different antibodies and types of samples, including whole blood or PMBCs, and found different proportions of these cell populations in the peripheral blood of dogs with cancer ( 45 , 46 ). As there are no standardized methodologies, we cannot compare the findings of the current study with those of previously published studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%