1999
DOI: 10.1006/jcat.1999.2521
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Ni/SiO2 Catalysts Prepared by Successive Deposition and Reduction of Ni2+ Ions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
120
2
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
13
120
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the monometallic Ni sample, the observed band at 2132 cm − 1 is attributed to CO polarized by Ni +2 ions [50]. The observed bands at 2056 and 2037 cm − 1 can be related to CO linearly bonded to the Ni surface [51] in agreement with Blackmond and Ko [52].…”
Section: Ftir Of Adsorbed Cosupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the monometallic Ni sample, the observed band at 2132 cm − 1 is attributed to CO polarized by Ni +2 ions [50]. The observed bands at 2056 and 2037 cm − 1 can be related to CO linearly bonded to the Ni surface [51] in agreement with Blackmond and Ko [52].…”
Section: Ftir Of Adsorbed Cosupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In general, adsorption of CO at RT on metallic Ni can be divided into two groups: (i) reversible and (ii) irreversible adsorbed. The irreversible adsorption is attributed to two different species: linear and bridge-bound CO [50]. The high frequency band at 2100-2000 cm − 1 can be assigned to linearly adsorbed CO on metallic Ni.…”
Section: Ftir Of Adsorbed Comentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The NiO crystallites supported on ZrO2 were reduced at approximately 673 K, which was nearly the same as that for the unsupported NiO. Ni/SiO2 also provided a peak maximum at the same temperature, but H2 consumption continued beyond 900 K. The higher-temperature peak is likely due to the reduction of Ni 2 ions from surface nickel philosilicates 23) . Ni/CeO2 was reduced at approximately 100 K lower than NiO, indicating that CeO2 promoted the reduction of NiO to the metal.…”
Section: E F F E C T O F T H E S U P P O R T O N S R E O V E R N Imentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Ni/SiO 2 shows a peak consisting of two components with maxima at 400 and 420 o C. This evidences some inhomogeneity of supported Ni. According to the data from the literature, 16 the TPR peaks are due to the reduction of NiO. No strong metal to support interaction (SMSI) is typical with silica.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%