Characterization of Patient Interest in Provider-Based Consumer Health Information Technology: Survey Study

Abstract

BackgroundConsumer health information technology can improve patient engagement in their health care and assist in navigating the complexities of health care delivery. However, the consumer health information technology offerings of health systems are often driven by provider rather than patient perspectives and inadequately address patient needs, thus limiting their adoption by patients. Consideration given to patients as stakeholders in the development of such technologies may improve adoption, efficacy, and consumer health information technology resource allocation.ObjectiveThe aims of this paper were to measure patient interest in different health system consumer health information technology apps and determine the influence of patient characteristics on consumer health information technology interest.MethodsPatients seen at the Cleveland Clinic Neurological Institute were electronically surveyed on their interest in using different consumer health information technology apps. A self-efficacy scale, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 depression screen, and EuroQol 5 dimensions health-related quality of life scale were also completed by patients. Logistic regression was used to determine the influence of patient characteristics on interest in consumer health information technology in the categories of self-management, education, and communication.ResultsThe majority of 3852 patient respondents had an interest in all technology categories assessed in the survey. The highest interest was in apps that allow patients to ask questions of providers (3476/3852, 90.24%) and to schedule appointments (3211/3839, 83.64%). Patient interest in consumer health information technology was significantly associated with greater depression symptoms, worse quality of life, greater health self-efficacy, and smartphone ownership (P<.001 for all listed).ConclusionsPatients should be viewed as active stakeholders in consumer health information technology development and their perspectives should consistently guide development efforts. Health systems should consider focusing on consumer health information technologies that assist patients in scheduling appointments and asking questions of providers. Patients with depression should also be considered for targeted consumer health information technology implementation. Health self-efficacy is a valid predictor of consumer health information technology interest and may play a role in the utilization of consumer health information technologies. Health systems, broadly, should put forth greater effort to understand the needs and interests of patients in the consumer health information technology development process. Consumer health information technology design and implementation may be improved by understanding which technologies patients want.

Engaging hematopoietic cell transplantation patients and caregivers in the design of print and mobile application individualized survivorship care plan tools

“…Our study clearly indicates that patients and caregivers need to be engaged in the process of developing these tools to ensure the technology fits their needs and will be used. This is consistent with previous research, which suggests that patients should be involved in and guide health technology development [26].…”

“…There were a variety of features that survivors wanted in an app, with a priority being options to tailor features to individual needs. The ability to allow participants to interact with mobile features is consistent with previous research [26,27]. Providing options for participants to write in content and complete action plans as part of an online intervention has been shown to have better outcomes (including reduced depression, stress) than those where participants just read online content [28].…”

An institution-wide faculty mentoring program at an academic health center with 6-year prospective outcome data

“…Survey questions were developed through an iterative process by the Mentor Leadership Council, which includes a multidisciplinary team with expertise in mentorship, career development, and academic leadership. Questions were assessed and piloted by the council for content, clarity, and comprehensiveness related to the program objectives [23]. The survey consisted of questions related to: college and department affiliations; career development and satisfaction; mentoring activities (e.g., participation in the program, frequency and duration of mentoring meetings, satisfaction across multiple mentoring domains); barriers for the mentee and mentor; interest in mentor training opportunities; demographic questions (optional if faculty had concerns about anonymity); and considering leaving MUSC in the next 2 years.…”

Providing Access: Differences in Pediatric Portal Activation Begin at Patient Check-in

“…Prior studies have shown that portal utilization may be impeded by limited health and electronic literacy among those with lower income level and educational attainment, which has been characterized as the "digital divide." 23,[29][30][31][32] Portal tasks require more health literacy and familiarity with technology than has been asked of patients previously; yet, it is unclear that the health system is addressing this gap in understanding.…”