2022
DOI: 10.37871/jbres1601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Patients with Chronic Diseases and Complex Care Needs: A New High-Risk Emergent Population

Abstract: Background: To analyze the prevalence and main epidemiological, clinical and outcome features of in-Patients with Complex Chronic conditions (PCC) in internal medicine areas, using a pragmatic working definition. Methods: Prospective study in 17 centers from Spain, with 97 in-hospital, monthly prevalence cuts. A PCC was considered when criteria of polypathological patient (two or more major chronic diseases) were met, or when a patient suffered one major chronic disease plus one or more of nine predefined com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 36 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[22] The mean was similar to a complex chronic patient population (4.3 comorbidities/patient). [23] The most common type detected in this study was hypervolemic hyponatremia (35.9%), followed by hypovolemic hyponatremia and euvolemic hyponatremia (32.7% and 31.1%, respectively). Even though this distribution is not consistent with other studies carried out on hospital samples, these data justify that CHF is the most prevalent pathology in IM units.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…[22] The mean was similar to a complex chronic patient population (4.3 comorbidities/patient). [23] The most common type detected in this study was hypervolemic hyponatremia (35.9%), followed by hypovolemic hyponatremia and euvolemic hyponatremia (32.7% and 31.1%, respectively). Even though this distribution is not consistent with other studies carried out on hospital samples, these data justify that CHF is the most prevalent pathology in IM units.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%