The role of plasma membrane aquaporins (PIPs) in water relations of Arabidopsis was studied by examining plants with reduced expression of PIP1 and PIP2 aquaporins, produced by crossing two different antisense lines. Compared with controls, the double antisense (dAS) plants had reduced amounts of PIP1 and PIP2 aquaporins, and the osmotic hydraulic conductivity of isolated root and leaf protoplasts was reduced 5-to 30-fold. The dAS plants had a 3-fold decrease in the root hydraulic conductivity expressed on a root dry mass basis, but a compensating 2.5-fold increase in the root to leaf dry mass ratio. The leaf hydraulic conductance expressed on a leaf area basis was similar for the dAS compared with the control plants. As a result, the hydraulic conductance of the whole plant was unchanged. Under sufficient and under water-deficient conditions, stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, plant hydraulic conductance, leaf water potential, osmotic pressure, and turgor pressure were similar for the dAS compared with the control plants. However, after 4 d of rewatering following 8 d of drying, the control plants recovered their hydraulic conductance and their transpiration rates faster than the dAS plants. Moreover, after rewatering, the leaf water potential was significantly higher for the control than for the dAS plants.From these results, we conclude that the PIPs play an important role in the recovery of Arabidopsis from the water-deficient condition.Water transport through cellular membranes is facilitated by aquaporins, proteins that form waterselective channels. The presence of aquaporins in a membrane can increase the osmotic hydraulic conductivity of the membrane (L P , meters per second per megapascal) by 10-to 20-fold (Preston et al., 1992). In plants, the physiological importance of aquaporins is currently mainly inferred from their widespread occurrence (Johansson et al., 2000) and the use of HgCl 2 , a nonspecific inhibitor (Tyerman et al., 2002). Aquaporins, which are found in almost all types of tissues (Maurel, 1997), have changed the way we think about plant water relations (Maurel and Chrispeels, 2001).Water movement through a living organ such as a root or a leaf can take an apoplastic route, which has a low resistance to flow, or a transcellular route, which has a higher resistance because water has to move through lipid bilayer membranes . Bulk water flow associated with the transpiration stream is mostly apoplastic, except in the root exo-and endodermis (Zimmermann et al., 2000) and in the leaf bundle sheath (Koroleva et al., 2002), where apoplastic barriers (Casparian band, suberin lamellae, and secondary cell wall thickening) restrict the apoplastic path. Other important processes such as cell enlargement, refilling of embolized vessels, and movement of guard cells and pulvini may require rapid transport of water across membranes. Furthermore, the considerable growth-associated water potential difference (0.1-0.3 MPa) found in most growing organs of herbaceous plants (e.g. Nonami and Boyer, 1...