1981
DOI: 10.3186/jjphytopath.47.58
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of resistance in rice to bacterial blight.

Abstract: Infection from strains of Xanthomonas campestris pv. oryzae on IR8, IR20 and IR1545 by the leaf clipping, pin-pricking and spray methods of inoculation suggested that neither lesion length nor disease score were affected.The incubation period was varied by methods of inoculation, but not by varietal resistance.Breeding lines derived from TKM 6 for Xa4 and DZ192 for xa5 sources of resistance were consistent with respective bacterial strains of the same virulence group, at maximum tillering stage of plant growth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…oryzae (Xoo), the causal agent of bacterial leaf blight, is developmentally controlled (Goel & Gupta 1990; Kim et al . 1987; Mew et al . 1981; Mew 1987; Ogawa 1993; Yeh et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…oryzae (Xoo), the causal agent of bacterial leaf blight, is developmentally controlled (Goel & Gupta 1990; Kim et al . 1987; Mew et al . 1981; Mew 1987; Ogawa 1993; Yeh et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LL, AUDPC, disease development over time, and dose-response curves reflected differences in resistance of IR24, Sabitri, and Laxmi. Previous studies also suggested that an appropriate dose of inoculum and the test of a rice cultivar at the proper growth stage is important in evaluating rice cultivar resistance to BB (15,16). The strains of X. o. oryzae from Nepal are virulent on most of the resistance genes that are currently used in rice breeding programs…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The principal criterion used previously for evaluation of rice cultivar-X. o. oryzae interaction was lesion length (LL) measured 30-40 days after clip inoculation of the leaves (15,16). One way of evaluating this interaction is to monitor inoculum doses of the pathogen needed to elicit a certain response in the host (8).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paint brush method of inoculation was found to be less effective as compared to other two methods but it was more similar to natural infection. Mew et al (1981) compared the needle prick, clip and spray technique and found that neither lesion length nor disease score were affected by inoculation method, although the incubation period was longer in spray inoculated plants than in other plants. The pin-prick method of inoculation developed by Muko and Yoshida (1951) and Yoshida and Muko (1961) proved most suitable for quantitative determination of causal bacterium.…”
Section: Isolation Purification and Testing The Pathogenicity:-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crop growth stages with reference to resistance were studied by few research workers. Mew et al (1981) reported that leaf and plant age influenced the infection which varied from young to old plants. Noda (1982) observed that the reaction of cultivars at different growth stages found to be helpful in classifying the pathogen isolates into different groups.…”
Section: Isolation Purification and Testing The Pathogenicity:-mentioning
confidence: 99%