1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0273-1223(98)00203-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of sediments from copenhagen harbour by use of biotests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, we carried out physicochemical characterization of the epipelic and benthic sediments of Cross River Estuary mangrove ecosystem, namely pH, clay, silt, sand, total organic carbon (TOC), nutritive salts, total organic nitrogen (TON), exchangeable cations, and we examined the distribution of heavy metals such as Pb, Cr, Cu, Zn, Fe, Ni, and V in the epipelic and benthic sediments in both wet and dry seasons. Our assessment of sediment contamination was based on (1) sediment quality guidelines (SQGs) used by US EPA (2) degree of contamination using the enrichment factor, the geo-accumulation index (I geo ) and the pollution load index (PLI); and (3) applications of two sets of guidelines: ERL/ERM and TEL/PEL and mean toxic units (Aloupi and Angelidis 2001;Woitke et al 2003;Reddy et al 2004;Selvaraj et al 2004;MacDonald et al 2000;Perin et al 1997;Pedersen et al 1998;Tomllinson et al 1980). A statistical correlation analysis between sediment metal concentrations was also performed to determine the possible anthropogenic sources of the heavy metal concentrations in the Cross River sediments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, we carried out physicochemical characterization of the epipelic and benthic sediments of Cross River Estuary mangrove ecosystem, namely pH, clay, silt, sand, total organic carbon (TOC), nutritive salts, total organic nitrogen (TON), exchangeable cations, and we examined the distribution of heavy metals such as Pb, Cr, Cu, Zn, Fe, Ni, and V in the epipelic and benthic sediments in both wet and dry seasons. Our assessment of sediment contamination was based on (1) sediment quality guidelines (SQGs) used by US EPA (2) degree of contamination using the enrichment factor, the geo-accumulation index (I geo ) and the pollution load index (PLI); and (3) applications of two sets of guidelines: ERL/ERM and TEL/PEL and mean toxic units (Aloupi and Angelidis 2001;Woitke et al 2003;Reddy et al 2004;Selvaraj et al 2004;MacDonald et al 2000;Perin et al 1997;Pedersen et al 1998;Tomllinson et al 1980). A statistical correlation analysis between sediment metal concentrations was also performed to determine the possible anthropogenic sources of the heavy metal concentrations in the Cross River sediments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ecotoxicological sense of heavy metal contamination in sediments was determined using sediment quality guidelines developed for marine and estuarine ecosystem [19]. The potential acute toxicity of contaminants in sediment sample can be estimated as the sum of the toxic units (∑TU) defined as the ratio of the determined concentration to PEL value [20]. Pollution will be measured as enrichment factor (EF), which is the amount or ratio of the sample metal enrichment above the concentration present in the reference station or material [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%