2017
DOI: 10.1111/1750-3841.13936
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Sensory Differences in Mixing and Premium Rums Through the Use of Descriptive Sensory Analysis

Abstract: These results demonstrate the previously developed rum flavor wheel can be used to adequately describe the flavor profile of rum. Additionally, results of this study document the sensory differences among premium rums and may be used to correlate with analytical data to better understand how changes in chemical composition of the product affect sensory perception.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sensory profiling of rums was approved by the NCSU Institutional Review Board for Human Subjects (IRB 7743). The sensory lexicon for aged rums used in the study was determined following review of published rum lexicons in four hour‐long roundtable sessions (Ickes & Cadwallader, ; Ickes & Cadwallader, ). During the roundtable sessions, commercial rums were diluted to 20% ABV using deionized water (Donnell, Hulin‐Bertaud, Sheehan, & Delahunty, ; Piggott, Carey, & Canaway, ), prepared for sensory evaluation in tulip‐shaped glasses (235 ml), covered with watch glasses, and were then tasted.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sensory profiling of rums was approved by the NCSU Institutional Review Board for Human Subjects (IRB 7743). The sensory lexicon for aged rums used in the study was determined following review of published rum lexicons in four hour‐long roundtable sessions (Ickes & Cadwallader, ; Ickes & Cadwallader, ). During the roundtable sessions, commercial rums were diluted to 20% ABV using deionized water (Donnell, Hulin‐Bertaud, Sheehan, & Delahunty, ; Piggott, Carey, & Canaway, ), prepared for sensory evaluation in tulip‐shaped glasses (235 ml), covered with watch glasses, and were then tasted.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Note : Adapted from Ickes and Cadwallader (), Ickes and Cadwallader (), and Leksrisompong, Lopetcharat, Guthrie, and Drake (). Developed using ASTM guidelines (ASTM, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A hybrid of Qualitative Descriptive Analysis ® (Stone, ) and the Spectrum™ method (Meilgaard et al., ; Muñoz & Civille, ) was used (Ickes & Cadwallader, ). Two rums were evaluated as a dilution series.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A hybrid of Qualitative Descriptive Analysis ® (Stone, 1992) and the Spectrum™ method (Meilgaard et al, 2007;Muñoz & Civille, 1992) was used (Ickes & Cadwallader, 2017a The panelists generated 23 attributes to describe the two different dilution series. The generated terms, term definitions, selected references, reference scores, and reference preparations are shown in Superscripts of the same letter within an attribute indicate no significant difference by Fisher's least significant difference (LSD) test at α = .05.…”
Section: Test Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation