2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.10.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of silanization and antibody immobilization on spin-on glass (SOG) surface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fundamental issues in the improvement of the antibodyeantigen interaction are optimised antibody immobilisation and antigen capture efficiency [18,19]. Immobilized antibodies on a porous polymer surface utilise the binding specificity of antibodyeantigen pairing to remove biotoxin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fundamental issues in the improvement of the antibodyeantigen interaction are optimised antibody immobilisation and antigen capture efficiency [18,19]. Immobilized antibodies on a porous polymer surface utilise the binding specificity of antibodyeantigen pairing to remove biotoxin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5c) therewith indicating an increased surface hydrophobicity possibly due to the protruding free amino groups of APTES. 40,41 Glutaraldehyde treatment preceding the silanization decreases the contact angle to 43.367 ( Fig. 5d).…”
Section: Characterization Of Immunoassay Matrixmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, according to Nagare and Mukherji (2009), the present preparation of the APTES solution at pH 5 may promote the amine group density of the silane. This condition, added to the MAb carboxyl group activation by EDC/NHS, could explain the immobilisation difference when APTES or GPTMS were used for the surface modification.…”
Section: Electrode Activity Testingmentioning
confidence: 98%