2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10295-008-0478-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of sulfate-reducing bacteria dominated surface communities during start-up of a down-flow fluidized bed reactor

Abstract: An anaerobic down-flow fluidized bed reactor was inoculated with granular sludge and started-up with sulfate containing synthetic wastewater to promote the formation of a biofilm enriched in sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB), to produce biogenic sulfide. The start-up was done in two stages operating the reactor in batch for 45 days followed by 85 days of continuous operation. Low-density polyethylene was used as support. The biofilm formation was followed up by biochemical and electron microscopy analyses and th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
13

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
21
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Almost half of the unique clones from this site were similar to Acholeplasma spp., which are distinguished by their lack of a cell wall and a particularly small and simple genome [43]. Other members of this class, i.e., some mycoplasmas, have the ability to form biofilms [28], and sequences similar to Acholeplasma have also been retrieved from a biofilm from a down-flow fluidized bed reactor [4]. The fact that distinct communities evolve in certain biofilms but not in others may be due to differences in adsorption material [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Almost half of the unique clones from this site were similar to Acholeplasma spp., which are distinguished by their lack of a cell wall and a particularly small and simple genome [43]. Other members of this class, i.e., some mycoplasmas, have the ability to form biofilms [28], and sequences similar to Acholeplasma have also been retrieved from a biofilm from a down-flow fluidized bed reactor [4]. The fact that distinct communities evolve in certain biofilms but not in others may be due to differences in adsorption material [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar time was necessary in the study of Celis et al [6], who used a lactate:ethanol mixture, a COD/SO 4 2− ratio of 0.6 and operated in batch mode for 45 days.…”
Section: Reactor Operationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, metal recovery cannot always be achieved in these reactors, since metals precipitate partly in the biomass, which hamper their recovery. A promising reactor configuration for metal sulfate reduction and metal removal in a single unit is the inversed fluidized bed (IFB) reactor [6]. This configuration is based on a floatable carrier material (on which the sulfate reducing bacteria biofilm is formed) which is fluidized downwards, whereas the metal sulfide precipitates settle and thus can be recovered at the bottom of the IFB [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, considering the practicality of applying an appropriate bioreactor configuration to treat metal contaminated waste streams, the foremost question in one's mind should be: should metal containing wastewater be treated in-situ or ex-situ?. Celis et al [9] & Janyasuthiwong et al [10] have tested a ''proof-of-concept'' of applying a down flow or inverse fluidized bed (IFB) reactor configuration for the treatment of low pH, sulfate rich wastewater supplied with an external carbon source, in order to produce sulfide and facilitate metal precipitation within the same unit. Similarly, for the sake of convenience and to avoid process disturbances, a two-step process can also be used to recover metals in the form of metal precipitates in bioreactors operating in sequencing batch mode (Figure 1).…”
Section: Opinion On Technological Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%