1988
DOI: 10.1016/0169-4332(88)90076-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of surface species on iron synthesis catalysts by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
92
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
7
92
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the passivation potential increases, the O-'(Fe) fraction content (11) slightly decreases, and the iron hydroxides contribution (12) begins to increase. A constant behaviour is observed for component 13, whereas 14, associated with the aluminium hydroxides and/or water increases up to a maximum at 1 V of applied potential, confirming the same observation inferred from the A1 2p spectra.…”
Section: Binding Energy (Ev)mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As the passivation potential increases, the O-'(Fe) fraction content (11) slightly decreases, and the iron hydroxides contribution (12) begins to increase. A constant behaviour is observed for component 13, whereas 14, associated with the aluminium hydroxides and/or water increases up to a maximum at 1 V of applied potential, confirming the same observation inferred from the A1 2p spectra.…”
Section: Binding Energy (Ev)mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…11 The peak at around 400.5 eV is typical for amide and amine and can serve as a marker. 4 The core level spectra clearly show that the detected nitrogen is not bound in the form of nitrate (from HNO 3 ) (407.3 eV).…”
Section: Biofilm and Bacteria Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note the small shoulder of the Fe absorption line at þ1:6 eV with respect to the main L 3 edge. It is absent for the annealed particles and might be due to the different chemical environment of Fe atoms at the NP-C interface, or to interstitial C atoms [31]. Its disappearance upon annealing would accordingly be attributed to graphitization of the amorphous C matrix at the NP surface [32,33], or to segregation of C interstitials due to the increased mixing enthalpy in the bcc phase [34].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%