2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of the Bacterial Communities of Life Stages of Free Living Lone Star Ticks (Amblyomma americanum)

Abstract: The lone star tick (Amblyomma americanum) is an abundant and aggressive biter of humans, domestic animals, and wildlife in the southeastern-central USA and an important vector of several known and suspected zoonotic bacterial pathogens. However, the biological drivers of bacterial community variation in this tick are still poorly defined. Knowing the community context in which tick-borne bacterial pathogens exist and evolve is required to fully understand the ecology and immunobiology of the ticks and to desig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
55
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
4
55
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, they carry numerous endosymbionts and commensals, which may provide nutrient supplements to the tick and also affect vector competence (reviewed in (Narasimhan & Fikrig, ; Bonnet et al., ; Clay & Fuqua, )). Studies have reported that the tick microbial community is variable depending on several factors such as source of host blood meal (Rynkiewicz, Hemmerich, Rusch, Fuqua, & Clay, ), feeding status (Menchaca et al., ; Swei & Kwan, ; Zhang et al., ), tick species, life stage, gender, and geographical origin (Carpi et al., ; Van Treuren et al., ; Williams‐Newkirk, Rowe, Mixson‐Hayden, & Dasch, ). However, very few studies have focused on the tick microbiome differences based on environmental conditions such as seasons of collection (Lalzar, Harrus, Mumcuoglu, & Gottlieb, ) or the immediate environment (Menchaca et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, they carry numerous endosymbionts and commensals, which may provide nutrient supplements to the tick and also affect vector competence (reviewed in (Narasimhan & Fikrig, ; Bonnet et al., ; Clay & Fuqua, )). Studies have reported that the tick microbial community is variable depending on several factors such as source of host blood meal (Rynkiewicz, Hemmerich, Rusch, Fuqua, & Clay, ), feeding status (Menchaca et al., ; Swei & Kwan, ; Zhang et al., ), tick species, life stage, gender, and geographical origin (Carpi et al., ; Van Treuren et al., ; Williams‐Newkirk, Rowe, Mixson‐Hayden, & Dasch, ). However, very few studies have focused on the tick microbiome differences based on environmental conditions such as seasons of collection (Lalzar, Harrus, Mumcuoglu, & Gottlieb, ) or the immediate environment (Menchaca et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But it remains unclear what factors drive natural variation of the tick microbiome and whether such variation would affect pathogen transmission in the wild and therefore regulate disease risk. Prior field studies have identified microbiome differences by tick species (Hawlena et al, 2013), sex (Williams-Newkirk et al, 2014;Zhang et al, 2014) and region (Carpi et al, 2011;van Treuren et al, 2015) but have not found correlations with host blood or the immediate environment (Hawlena et al, 2013;Rynkiewicz et al, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…To date, in order to identify protein families and dis-70 cover novel target antigen, salivary gland (SG) transcriptomes from 71 several ticks species have been described (Chmelar et al, 2008;72 Aljamali et al, 2009a;Francischetti et al, 2011). 73 Among the various transcriptome studies, next generation Williams-Newkirk et al, 2012;Hue et al, 2013;Kaewkong et al, 81 2014; Budachetri et al, 2014;Carpi et al, 2011) and parasitic 82 communities (Bonnet et al, 2014) associated with ticks. Until 83 now, transcriptomic analyses of SG of only a few ticks (Karim 84 et al, 2011;Schwarz et al, 2013Schwarz et al, , 2014 have been performed using 85 RNA-Seq technique, but H. flava SG transcriptome has not been 86 explored.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%