2006
DOI: 10.1128/jb.188.2.507-514.2006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of the Opposing Roles of H-NS and TraJ in Transcriptional Regulation of the F-Plasmid tra Operon

Abstract: The transfer (tra) operon of the conjugative F plasmid of Escherichia coli is a polycistronic 33-kb operon which encodes most of the proteins necessary for F-plasmid transfer. Here, we report that transcription from P Y , the tra operon promoter, is repressed by the host nucleoid-associated protein, H-NS. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays indicate that H-NS binds preferentially to the tra promoter region, while Northern blot and transcriptional fusion analyses indicate that transcription of traY, the first… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
47
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
2
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the proposed role for F TraJ in simply antagonizing H-NS at the P Y promoter seems to be only partially true for R1. Deletion of hns led to a 10-fold increase in mating efficiency of plasmid R1; in contrast Will & Frost reported a 10 4 -fold increase of mating efficiency of F (Will & Frost, 2006), suggesting that H-NS mediated silencing is more effective in that case. Since F TraJ is not subject to FinOP regulation due to a disruption of finO by IS3 (Cheah & Skurray, 1986), higher TraJ levels and thus, compared with R1 and other repressed plasmids, higher transfer gene expression are observed throughout the growth cycle.…”
Section: Silencing and Counter-silencingmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, the proposed role for F TraJ in simply antagonizing H-NS at the P Y promoter seems to be only partially true for R1. Deletion of hns led to a 10-fold increase in mating efficiency of plasmid R1; in contrast Will & Frost reported a 10 4 -fold increase of mating efficiency of F (Will & Frost, 2006), suggesting that H-NS mediated silencing is more effective in that case. Since F TraJ is not subject to FinOP regulation due to a disruption of finO by IS3 (Cheah & Skurray, 1986), higher TraJ levels and thus, compared with R1 and other repressed plasmids, higher transfer gene expression are observed throughout the growth cycle.…”
Section: Silencing and Counter-silencingmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…1). We therefore set up experiments to elucidate whether regulation of tra gene expression at the P Y promoter in the case of the naturally repressed plasmid R1 displays similar characteristics to those found for the F plasmid (Will & Frost, 2006;Will et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The importance of H-NS in regulating horizontal gene transfer is not limited to pathogenesis. The regulatory protein TraJ counter-silences H-NS repression of the tra genes in the F plasmid of E. coli but is dispensable for conjugal transfer in an hns mutant [54], demonstrating that H-NS can limit plasmid mobilization. Some plasmids such as the Salmonella plasmid R27 carry their own H-NS-like protein (Sfh, in the case of R27) that appears to prevent detrimental consequences of H-NS titration by AT-rich sequences [55•] and thereby allow the recipient cell to tolerate the plasmid.…”
Section: Counter-silencing Of H-ns and Its Functional Consequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%