1997
DOI: 10.1006/bbrc.1997.6947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of the Pleckstrin Homology Domain of Btk as an Inositol Polyphosphate and Phosphoinositide Binding Domain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
48
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
5
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The activation of Btk was observed at concentrations of 10 nM to 10 M, thus yielding a 50% maximal activation (EC 50 ) of ϳ100 nM. This result closely corresponds to the value reported by others for the affinity of the Btk PH domain for PtdIns-3,4,5-P 3 (100 -700 nM) and is consistent with a direct interaction between PtdIns-3,4,5-P 3 and the Btk PH domain being involved in the kinase activation effect (16,22).…”
Section: Ptdins-345-psupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The activation of Btk was observed at concentrations of 10 nM to 10 M, thus yielding a 50% maximal activation (EC 50 ) of ϳ100 nM. This result closely corresponds to the value reported by others for the affinity of the Btk PH domain for PtdIns-3,4,5-P 3 (100 -700 nM) and is consistent with a direct interaction between PtdIns-3,4,5-P 3 and the Btk PH domain being involved in the kinase activation effect (16,22).…”
Section: Ptdins-345-psupporting
confidence: 89%
“…As has previously been reported, substitution of R28C in the Btk PH domain reduces binding to PtdInsP 3 (8), whereas substitution of E41K dramatically increases binding. The wild-type Tec PH domain binds PtdInsP 3 but to a lesser degree than the wild-type Btk PH domain, as was previously reported (6). Interestingly, both the R29C and E42K substitutions in the Tec PH domain substantially reduce binding to PtdInsP 3 .…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The diversity of primary sequence appears to lend to the ability to bind other molecules with variable a nities, when comparing di erent PH domains. For example, phospholipid binding a nities vary greatly between individual PH domains with the PH domain from PLC-d1 preferring Ins-(1,4,5)P3 and PtdIns(4,5)P2, while others, like the PH domains from Btk and PKB, prefer PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 (Gray et al, 1999;Kojima et al, 1997;Lemmon et al, 1995). Similar disparities for protein binding are seen for protein binding partners for PH domains (Rodriguez et al, 1999).…”
Section: Ph Domain-directed Interactions Between Afap-110 and Signalimentioning
confidence: 88%