2016
DOI: 10.1117/1.nph.3.2.025004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of the relative contributions from systemic physiological noise to whole-brain resting-state functional near-infrared spectroscopy data using single-channel independent component analysis

Abstract: Characterization of the relative contributions from systemic physiological noise to whole-brain resting-state functional near-infrared spectroscopy data using single-channel independent component analysis," Neurophoton. Abstract. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is a noninvasive neuroimaging technique used to measure changes in oxygenated hemoglobin (oxy-Hb) and deoxygenated hemoglobin (deoxy-Hb) in the brain. In this study, we present a decomposition approach based on single-channel independent c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
19
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Using short-separation measurements to remove physiology-based artifacts assumes that the same components are found in both the skin and brain. In a recently published paper, 71 we found up to a 7-s delay between different measurements sites; this delay might be found between the skin and brain regions. Therefore, a simple regressor may not be efficient enough to remove the physiological noise.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Using short-separation measurements to remove physiology-based artifacts assumes that the same components are found in both the skin and brain. In a recently published paper, 71 we found up to a 7-s delay between different measurements sites; this delay might be found between the skin and brain regions. Therefore, a simple regressor may not be efficient enough to remove the physiological noise.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…We deliberately used real resting-state measurements instead of purely simulated systemic signals, because we expected that simulated noise could only insufficiently reflect heterogeneous behavior in the scalp and brain layers. A possible limitation of this approach is that resting-state measurements may contain spontaneous neural activity with amplitudes comparable to functional brain activity, 7 , 54 , 55 hampering the efficacy of the regression. Therefore, it is important to investigate the performance of the different GLM approaches through simulations and actual motor-execution runs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 5 , 6 Despite its versatile use, there remain several challenges, in particular, the sensitivity of continuous-wave fNIRS to hemodynamic changes of non-neuronal origin. 2 , 7 10 These are often referred to as physiological “noise” or “interference” and include systemic activities, such as cardiac pulsation (1 to 2 Hz), respiration (0.2 to 0.4 Hz), low-frequency oscillations ( ) and very low-frequency oscillations (0.01 to 0.05 Hz), 11 and an increase in blood flow through sympathetic nervous activity. 12 These artifacts generate signal changes that may mimic or mask true task-evoked hemodynamic responses (HRs) and may lead to false positives or false negatives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note that fNIRS measurements are contaminated by systemic interference of especially (but not limited to) extracerebral regions, which is mainly caused by cardiac pulsations, respiration, and blood-pressure variations (Boas et al, 2004;Tachtsidis and Scholkmann, 2016). Several approaches have been reported in the literature to reduce these noises: conventional band-pass filtering (Hocke et al, 2018;Pinti et al, 2019); modeling physiological noises as a sum of sinusoidal functions with known frequencies where their amplitudes are estimated by using the extended Kalman filter and regressed out using a general linear model (Prince et al, 2003); global signalcovariance removal by either principal/independent component analysis (Zhang et al, 2005;Aarabi and Huppert, 2016) or global average procedures (Batula et al, 2017); adaptive filters that use recursive least-squares estimation methods (Nguyen et al, 2018) or short-distance channel (SDC) regression (Saager and Berger, 2005;Saager et al, 2011;Goodwin et al, 2014). In fNIRS measurements these SDCs are channels that have reduced inter-optode separations such that the interrogated volume is confined primarily to extracerebral regions (Goodwin et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%