2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2011.01.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of the thermo-reduction process of chalcopyrite at 65°C by cyclic voltammetry and XANES spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
50
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of pH 1.8, Cu 2 O is not likely to present on the chalcopyrite surface. Chalcocite forms at a negative potential (Liang et al, 2011;Nava et al, 2008), so covellite is the most likely explanation to this observation which formed as shown by reaction (7). In a previous study, Nava and González (2006) suggested that covellite forms in the potential range between 863 mV and 943 mV.…”
Section: Nexafs Studiesmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In the case of pH 1.8, Cu 2 O is not likely to present on the chalcopyrite surface. Chalcocite forms at a negative potential (Liang et al, 2011;Nava et al, 2008), so covellite is the most likely explanation to this observation which formed as shown by reaction (7). In a previous study, Nava and González (2006) suggested that covellite forms in the potential range between 863 mV and 943 mV.…”
Section: Nexafs Studiesmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Peak e was considered to be the reduction of Fe 3+ and bornite shown in Equations (6) and 7 [27,31,32]. Peak f should be the reduction of Cu 2 S to metal copper [31,33]:…”
Section: Surface Transformation Of Bornite At Different Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cyclic voltammograms of the two different chalcopyrite electrodes were significantly different. According to many other publications, the anodic and cathodic peaks can be assigned to the corresponding oxidation-reduction reactions (Arce and González, 2002;Eghbalnia and Dixon, 2011;Gu et al, 2013;Liang et al, 2011;Zeng et al, 2013). Peak (a) was mainly considered as the reduction of chalcopyrite to chalcocite (Cu 2 S) in the presence of Cu 2+ as shown in Eq.…”
Section: Electrochemical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the effects of pyrite and bornite on bioleaching of chalcopyrite cannot be ignored. Some researchers (Gu et al, 2013;Liang et al, 2011;Majuste et al, 2012;Qin et al, 2013;Zhao et al, 2015a) have reported that chalcopyrite can be reduced to bornite at the initial stage of bioleaching and this first step was also a http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.07.003 0960-8524/Ó 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. rate-limiting step.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%