1995
DOI: 10.1016/s0176-1617(11)81847-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Thirteen Date Palm(Phoenix dactylifera L.) Cultivars by Enzyme Electrophoresis using the PhastSystem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Fortunately, the revealed SSR alleles were successfully used to molecularly discriminate a nearly unlimited number of date palm cultivars. Compared to other studies of date palms, the scored percentage of resolution is higher than those observed using isoenzymes (Booij et al, 1995;Salem et al, 2001) and plastid DNA haplotypes (Sakka, 2003). These authors reported 69, 93, and 71% resolving power, respectively.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…Fortunately, the revealed SSR alleles were successfully used to molecularly discriminate a nearly unlimited number of date palm cultivars. Compared to other studies of date palms, the scored percentage of resolution is higher than those observed using isoenzymes (Booij et al, 1995;Salem et al, 2001) and plastid DNA haplotypes (Sakka, 2003). These authors reported 69, 93, and 71% resolving power, respectively.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…This study is more precise and accurate compared to other date palm studies, i.e. plastid DNA halophytes (Sakka 2003 ) and isozymes (Salem et al 2001 ; Booij et al 1995 ). These data proved that SSR markers are more influential, powerful and key identifiers of date palm sex for speeding up the breeding programs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Fortunately, the revealed SSR alleles were successfully used to molecularly discriminate a nearly unlimited number of date‐palms cultivars. Compared to studies reported in date‐palms, the scored percentage of resolution is higher than observed using isoenzymes (B ooij et al 1995; O uld M ohamed S alem et al 2001) and plastid DNA haplotypes (S akka 2003). These authors have reported 69%, 93% and 71% resolving power values respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%