Characterization of Triticum turgidum sspp. durum, turanicum, and polonicum grown in Central Italy in relation to technological and nutritional aspects

Abstract

IntroductionWheat is a staple food, with the two most common species being Triticum aestivum and Triticum turgidum ssp. durum. Moreover, the latter, T. turgidum, includes other tetraploid subspecies, among which the sspp. turanicum (Khorasan wheat) and polonicum (Polish wheat), whose importance has increased in the last decades, representing alternative crops for marginal areas, in addition to being a source of genetic diversity.MethodsIn this work, different accessions of these three subspecies of T. turgidum have been grown in 2 years in the same environment and have been characterized for technological properties and factors affecting nutritional quality, such as fiber amount and the content of micro- and macro-nutrients in grains, and for root morphological traits.ResultsThese analyses allowed the identification, in particular, of a Polish wheat accession showing better technological performances, a higher amount of positive micro- and macro-elements, and a lower amount of toxic cadmium. The modern variety Svevo and the Polish Pol2 showed the lowest and the highest shoot:root ratio, respectively. The high shoot:root ratio in Pol2 was mainly attributable to the decrease in root growth. Although Pol2 had a lower root biomass, its particular root morphology made it more efficient for nutrient uptake, as evident from the greater accumulation of micro- and macro-nutrients.DiscussionThese results underline that it is not possible to draw general conclusions about the difference between primitive and modern wheats, but rather a case-by-case approach should be chosen.

Characterization among and within Sicilian Tetraploid Wheat Landraces by Gluten Protein Analysis for Traceability Purposes

“…Several studies demonstrated that some of these accessions have a higher content of phenols [ 8 , 9 , 10 ], a higher concentration of minerals [ 11 ], and increased prebiotic carbohydrates [ 12 ] compared to elite varieties. Other studies supposed that their superior beneficial effects were not due to their characteristic of being “old” but that they are more related to genotype and growth conditions [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ]. To prove the beneficial-promoting attributes of ancient varieties, further investigations are required, with standard analysis methods on multiple genotypes of old and modern wheat grown in replicated multi-site field trials [ 18 ].…”