2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.04.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of ultrasonic vocalizations of Fragile X mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
17
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
5
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A previous study that used a different mating paradigm to elicit calls from the males also found that Fmr1 KO mice emitted the same number of calls compared to the WT mice. In contrast to our findings they did not detect any differences in the average duration of USVs (Belagodu et al, 2016). One other adult FXS USV study reported a significantly decreased amount of calls in Fmr1 KO mice (Rotschafer et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A previous study that used a different mating paradigm to elicit calls from the males also found that Fmr1 KO mice emitted the same number of calls compared to the WT mice. In contrast to our findings they did not detect any differences in the average duration of USVs (Belagodu et al, 2016). One other adult FXS USV study reported a significantly decreased amount of calls in Fmr1 KO mice (Rotschafer et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The number of USVs may not be a key determinant in detecting communication deficits in FXS and other autism mouse models. Our results support recent findings suggesting call types and acoustic properties to be more representative of the atypical communication patterns observed in the syndrome (Belagodu et al, 2016; Holy & Guo, 2005; Scattoni et al, 2008). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations