BHI agars supplemented with vancomycin 4 (BHI-V4) and 3 (BHI-V3) mg/liter have been proposed for screening vancomycin intermediately susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (VISA) and heteroresistant (hVISA) phenotypes, respectively, but growth interpretation criteria have not been established. We reviewed the growth results (CFU) during population analysis profile-area under the curve (PAP-AUC) of consecutive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) blood isolates, which were saved intermittently between 1996 and 2012. CFU counts on BHI-V4 and BHI-V3 plates were stratified according to PAP-AUC interpretive criteria: <0.90 (susceptible [S-MRSA]), 0.90 to 1.3 (hVISA), and >1.3 (VISA). CFU cutoffs that best predict VISA and hVISA were determined with the use of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Mu3, Mu50, and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) controls were included. We also prospectively evaluated manufacturer-made BHI-V3/BHI-V4 biplates for screening of 2010-2012 isolates. The PAP-AUC of 616 clinical samples was consistent with S-MRSA, hVISA, and VISA in 550 (89.3%), 48 (7.8%), and 18 (2.9%) instances, respectively. For VISA screening on BHI-V4, a cutoff of 2 CFU/droplet provided 100% sensitivity and 97.7% specificity. To distinguish VISA from hVISA, a cutoff of 16 CFU provided 83.3% sensitivity and 94.7% specificity; the specificity was lowered to 89.5% with a 12-CFU cutoff. For detecting hVISA/VISA on BHI-V3, a 2-CFU/ droplet cutoff provided 98.5% sensitivity and 93.8% specificity. These results suggest that 2-CFU/droplet cutoffs on BHI-V4 and BHI-V3 best approximate VISA and hVISA gold standard confirmation, respectively, with minimal overlap in samples with borderline PAP-AUC. Simultaneous screening for VISA/hVISA on manufacturer-made BHI-V4/BHI-V3 biplates is easy to standardize and may reduce the requirement for PAP-AUC confirmation.
Several methods of screening for vancomycin intermediately susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (VISA) and heteroresistant (hVISA) strains among clinical isolates exist, but the optimal method has not been clearly defined (1-17). Etest methods, including the Macromethod and glycopeptide resistance detection (GRD), have been suggested, but their sensitivity and specificity are variable and confirmation with the gold standard population analysis profile is considered necessary (2,4,7,10,12,15,17). Several agar screening methods that utilize brain heart infusion (BHI) agar or Mueller-Hinton (MH) agar supplemented with vancomycin or teicoplanin at various concentrations have been proposed (1,4,6,11,13,14,16). BHI agar supplemented with 3 mg/liter vancomycin was reported to have 100% sensitivity and 65% specificity for detecting VISA (1), whereas supplementation with 5 mg/liter or higher lacked the sensitivity to detect VISA and was unreliable for detecting hVISA (3). BHI agar supplemented with 4 mg/liter vancomycin was reported to be insensitive in one study (14) and provided 90% sensitivity and 95% specificity for detecting VISA using a 0.5 McFarland inoculum...