2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.simpat.2019.101952
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of variable inductors using finite element analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are three main approaches utilized to control the relative permeability of magnetic cores: 1) current-controlled approach, and it is the most popular one that utilizes an external DC bias current to adjust the relative permeability of the magnetic core; 2) liquid-controlled approach, and it is the less popular approach that employs MEMS technology in conjunction with liquid fluids to alter the relative permeability of the medium, which represents the magnetic core in that case; 3) voltage-controlled approach, still-evolving technology that employs an external DC bias voltage to adjust the relative permeability of the magnetic core. The first technique is DC current bias, also known as actively current-controlled variable inductors, and is the most frequently utilized in power electronic converters, as discussed in [16], [20], [21], [22], [70], [71] , [72], [73], [74], [75], [76], [77] and [78]. While, the second and third approaches are less popular in power electronic applications.…”
Section: Relative Permeability Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are three main approaches utilized to control the relative permeability of magnetic cores: 1) current-controlled approach, and it is the most popular one that utilizes an external DC bias current to adjust the relative permeability of the magnetic core; 2) liquid-controlled approach, and it is the less popular approach that employs MEMS technology in conjunction with liquid fluids to alter the relative permeability of the medium, which represents the magnetic core in that case; 3) voltage-controlled approach, still-evolving technology that employs an external DC bias voltage to adjust the relative permeability of the magnetic core. The first technique is DC current bias, also known as actively current-controlled variable inductors, and is the most frequently utilized in power electronic converters, as discussed in [16], [20], [21], [22], [70], [71] , [72], [73], [74], [75], [76], [77] and [78]. While, the second and third approaches are less popular in power electronic applications.…”
Section: Relative Permeability Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To quantify these concepts, it is important to include the impact of ripple current in influencing the copper and core losses. The detailed analytical expressions that relate this explanation are presented in [14]. The levels of current ripple also influence the switching losses.…”
Section: Simulation and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, Q v ðsÞ will be the product of ( 14) and the inverse of (9) excluding the NMPZ. When the NMPZ is eliminated, the relative degree of ( 9) is 1, hence F Q ðsÞ can be selected in the same way as (14) with values of α different from (14), and Q v ðsÞ will be as shown in (16):…”
Section: Control Design Using Affine Parameterisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations