38th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit 2000
DOI: 10.2514/6.2000-788
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of vortex breakdown by flow field and surface measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…al. 23 from Onera's F2 wind tunnel. Onera's F2 wind tunnel has a rectangular test section with a width of 1.4m, a height of 1.8m, and a length of 5m.…”
Section: Experimental Methods and Facilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…al. 23 from Onera's F2 wind tunnel. Onera's F2 wind tunnel has a rectangular test section with a width of 1.4m, a height of 1.8m, and a length of 5m.…”
Section: Experimental Methods and Facilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al. 23 was next used to determine the degree to which SADES and the other models matched the experiments. A set of SADES time slices were interrogated to determine the vortex breakdown position as a function of time for several cycles of the primary frequency.…”
Section: Comparison With Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formulation used the Spalart-Allmaras (SA) (97) turbulence model in the RANS portion and Detached Eddy Simulation (DES) for coupling to the LES portion. The study focused on a 70 • delta wing tested by Mitchel et al (98) as part of a larger vortex breakdown study (99) facilitated through the NATO Research and Technology Organization 5 (RTO). Unstructured grids of approximately 2.5 m cells were used for the simulation, and a sample result is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Hybrid Rans/les Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is consistent with the available data in the literature, which indicate that the r.m.s. value of the velocity fluctuations downstream of vortex breakdown is fairly axisymmetric, and therefore cannot explain the observed asymmetric buffeting response (Kommallein and Hummel, 1993;McCormick and Gursul, 1996;Mitchell et al, 2000). Note that the time-averaged cross-flow velocity is always higher inboard of the vortex core, which is suspected to play an important role in the observed asymmetry for the buffeting response.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 78%