1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0273-1223(98)00415-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of wastewater and activated sludge from European municipal wastewater treatment plants using the nur test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The NUR2 values in the corresponding experiments varied within the range 1.3-1.4 (winter), 1.0-2.0 (spring) and 1.6-1.7 g N/(kg VSS Á h) (summer). These ranges are comparable with the values reported by Naidoo et al (1998) for the experiments at the WWTPs located in eight European cities. In that study, the NURs associated with utilization of the readily biodegradable and slowly biodegradable substrates varied within the range of 3.3-5.7 g N/(kg VSS Á h) and 1.6-3.6 g N/(kg VSS Á h), respectively.…”
Section: ''Conventional'' Nur Testssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The NUR2 values in the corresponding experiments varied within the range 1.3-1.4 (winter), 1.0-2.0 (spring) and 1.6-1.7 g N/(kg VSS Á h) (summer). These ranges are comparable with the values reported by Naidoo et al (1998) for the experiments at the WWTPs located in eight European cities. In that study, the NURs associated with utilization of the readily biodegradable and slowly biodegradable substrates varied within the range of 3.3-5.7 g N/(kg VSS Á h) and 1.6-3.6 g N/(kg VSS Á h), respectively.…”
Section: ''Conventional'' Nur Testssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Naidoo et al (1998) correspond to the ratio COD ff0.45 / COD TOT as no S U values were reported for the data set).Values deduced from the methods employed in this study (from COD ff,0.45 and assuming a S U fraction of 0.04) are also reported in this graph; they are in accordance with literature data.Such as for BCOD, RBCOD values seem to depend on the method employed. RBCOD fractions obtained by physicochemical techniques (0.25 -0.29 excluding Naidoo et al 1998, see above) are significantly higher than the ones deduced from OUR and NUR bioassays (0.05 -0.19).…”
supporting
confidence: 84%
“…Nevertheless, the SBR method also shows limitations: as wastewater is stored at 48C for a long period, the biodegradable fraction can be degraded during storage. * Roeleveld and van Loosdrecht, 2002Melcer et al, 2003 This study Sperandio et al, 2001Ginestet et al, 2002Ohron et al, 1997Melcer et al, 2003Naidoo et al, 1998 RBCOD This difference was also observed by Melcer et al (2003) on the basis of tests carried out on the same wastewater samples. Because they require less sophisticated apparatus and skills and less time, physicochemical methods represent however attractive alternatives to biological tests.…”
Section: Flocculation/filtration Versus Simple Filtrationmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The range of NURs reported in the literature(Henze et al 1995) for municipal wastewater is 1.0-5.0 g N/(kg VSS·h) at T ¼ 208C Naidoo et al (1998). measured NURs at the WWTPs located in eight European cities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%