1983
DOI: 10.1016/s0074-7742(08)60225-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of α1-and α2-Adrenergic Receptors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
67
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 233 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 250 publications
4
67
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The outstanding feature of the isomeric ratios was the large ratio for each form of synephrine at x,-adrenoceptors particularly m-synephrine with a ratio of 420. This was greater than that for NA or for the equivalent octopamine, suggesting that when the configuration of There is considerable evidence that the cerebral and peripheral subtypes of cx-adrenoceptors are similar (Bylund & U'Prichard, 1983). However, caution is necessary in extrapolating too far, particularly as a2-adrenoceptor isotypes have been proposed to explain the pharmacological differences between rodent and non-rodent species (Cheung et al, 1982;Latifpour et al, 1982;Feller & Bylund, 1984;Alabaster et al, 1986) and there is mounting evidence of a heterogeneity within species (Bylund, 1985 Considering the members of a series of compounds, if the difference between pD2 and affinity remains constant as the pD2 falls, then loss of activity can be attributed entirely to loss of affinity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The outstanding feature of the isomeric ratios was the large ratio for each form of synephrine at x,-adrenoceptors particularly m-synephrine with a ratio of 420. This was greater than that for NA or for the equivalent octopamine, suggesting that when the configuration of There is considerable evidence that the cerebral and peripheral subtypes of cx-adrenoceptors are similar (Bylund & U'Prichard, 1983). However, caution is necessary in extrapolating too far, particularly as a2-adrenoceptor isotypes have been proposed to explain the pharmacological differences between rodent and non-rodent species (Cheung et al, 1982;Latifpour et al, 1982;Feller & Bylund, 1984;Alabaster et al, 1986) and there is mounting evidence of a heterogeneity within species (Bylund, 1985 Considering the members of a series of compounds, if the difference between pD2 and affinity remains constant as the pD2 falls, then loss of activity can be attributed entirely to loss of affinity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The range of densities ofa2-adrenoceptor binding sites in the rat cortex reported in the literature is wide (90-242fmolmg-1 protein, Bylund & U'Prichard, 1983;Lane et al, 1983), a finding probably related to different assay conditions and to membrane preparations being purified to different extents. In order to compare the binding of [3H] [3H]-idazoxan (1-12nM) to membranes from rat cerebrum was rapid, reversible, saturable and of high affinity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the low affinity exhibited by yohimbine for truly 'high' affinity [3H]-prazosin (0.01-0.05 nM) sites suggests that [3H]-yohimbine binding is not to an a1-adrenoceptor site. This also means that the affinity ratio between yohimbine and prazosin is not as useful for differentiating between al-and a2-adrenoceptor subtypes as originally suggested (Bylund & U'Prichard, 1983). A moderately high potency of prazosin at rat a2-adrenoceptors has also been demonstrated in functional studies of noradrenaline release in the rat submandibular gland (Turner et al, 1984).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Membranes were filtered, washed, dried, and counted as for muscarine re ceptors. The Kd for prazosin has been reported to be 0.14-0.31 nM for brain and 0.1-0.9 nM for peripheral tissues (Bylund and U'Prichard, 1983), so 3 nM [3Hlprazosin should label at least 75% of all known aj receptors. Nonspecific binding for vessel preparations was 30-50% of total binding.…”
Section: Assay Of Lycreceptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Filters were then washed, dried, and counted as for muscarine receptors. The Kd for this ligand is 1-3 nM (Bylund and U'Prichard, 1983), so 3 nM should yield at least 50% saturation. Nonspecific binding was 40-60% of total binding.…”
Section: Assay Of Lyrreceptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%