Proceedings of the Twentieth International Cryogenic Engineering Conference (ICEC20) 2005
DOI: 10.1016/b978-008044559-5/50233-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization Studies of Sputter Deposited Cermet Cryogenic Heaters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We find that above 80mK the thermal contact of our thermometer is comparable to that of RuO 23 , Speer 24 , and Ge 23 thermometers and it is superior when compared to Cernox 23 and another RuO 8 . Below 30mK, however, our thermometer has the best thermal contact.…”
Section: Fig2 Self-heating Curves T Vs the Joule Excitation Power Pmentioning
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We find that above 80mK the thermal contact of our thermometer is comparable to that of RuO 23 , Speer 24 , and Ge 23 thermometers and it is superior when compared to Cernox 23 and another RuO 8 . Below 30mK, however, our thermometer has the best thermal contact.…”
Section: Fig2 Self-heating Curves T Vs the Joule Excitation Power Pmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…At 6mK R th is 1.5x10 9 K/W for our thermometer as compared to 3.3x10 10 K/W 3 and 4.0x10 10 K/W 4 for Speer thermometers. Hence the thermal contact at 6mK of our thermometer Th-1 is about a factor of 5 better than that of Speer thermometers 3,4 and it is at least a factor of 200 better than the extrapolated value for RuO 8,23 . We conclude that at the lowest temperatures our thermometer has the best thermal contact to its environment among all resistance thermometers.…”
Section: Fig2 Self-heating Curves T Vs the Joule Excitation Power Pmentioning
confidence: 89%