2022
DOI: 10.3390/fuels3010005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization Techniques Coupled with Mathematical Tools for Deepening Asphaltene Structure

Abstract: Asphaltenes are the heavy fraction of fossil fuels, whose characterization remains a very difficult and challenging issue due to the still-persisting uncertainties about their structure and/or composition and molecular weight. Asphaltene components are highly condensed aromatic molecules having some heteroatoms and aliphatic functionalities. Their molecular weights distribution spans in a wide range, from hundreds to millions of mass units, depending on the diagnostic used, which is mainly due to the occurrenc… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the same figure we report the m/I(G) evaluated on Raman spectra of soot and different carbonaceous materials listed in Table 1 that are coal tar pitch (CTP) 74 and its toluene insoluble fraction (CTP-TI), 75 a naphthalene pitch (NP) 74 and its toluene soluble (NP-TS) and insoluble (NP-TI) fractions, 75 and heavy fuel oil asphaltenes, obtained by heptane insolubilization. 80 The m/I(G) has been estimated also for hydrogen-rich soot samples like those derived from premixed fuel-rich ethylene and methane flames at low heights above the burner (4.5 mm for ethylene and 5 and 7 mm for the methane flame). 29 Only some samples could be analyzed by combustion analysis due to the low sample amounts, but hydrogen data obtained from other techniques, namely Raman (m/I(G), H mol % (using the Casiraghi formula)) and FTIR spectroscopy (H mol %, aromatic hydrogen (H ar ) mol % and aliphatic hydrogen (H ali ) mol %), could be obtained as listed in Table 1.…”
Section: Results and Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the same figure we report the m/I(G) evaluated on Raman spectra of soot and different carbonaceous materials listed in Table 1 that are coal tar pitch (CTP) 74 and its toluene insoluble fraction (CTP-TI), 75 a naphthalene pitch (NP) 74 and its toluene soluble (NP-TS) and insoluble (NP-TI) fractions, 75 and heavy fuel oil asphaltenes, obtained by heptane insolubilization. 80 The m/I(G) has been estimated also for hydrogen-rich soot samples like those derived from premixed fuel-rich ethylene and methane flames at low heights above the burner (4.5 mm for ethylene and 5 and 7 mm for the methane flame). 29 Only some samples could be analyzed by combustion analysis due to the low sample amounts, but hydrogen data obtained from other techniques, namely Raman (m/I(G), H mol % (using the Casiraghi formula)) and FTIR spectroscopy (H mol %, aromatic hydrogen (H ar ) mol % and aliphatic hydrogen (H ali ) mol %), could be obtained as listed in Table 1.…”
Section: Results and Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the same figure we report the m / I (G) evaluated on Raman spectra of soot and different carbonaceous materials listed in Table that are coal tar pitch (CTP) and its toluene insoluble fraction (CTP-TI), a naphthalene pitch (NP) and its toluene soluble (NP-TS) and insoluble (NP-TI) fractions, and heavy fuel oil asphaltenes, obtained by heptane insolubilization . The m / I (G) has been estimated also for hydrogen-rich soot samples like those derived from premixed fuel-rich ethylene and methane flames at low heights above the burner (4.5 mm for ethylene and 5 and 7 mm for the methane flame) …”
Section: Results and Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, different groups have reported mean MW spanning two orders of magnitude for similar LDI setups and asphaltene samples [69][70][71][72]. However, the variation of some experimental parameters, such as laser pulse energy [73] and sample concentration, can heavily affect the measured mass spectrum. In general, heavier measured masses are observed if a higher pulse energy or concentration are employed, even if a too high energy can even cause fragmentation and it is necessary to choose a good compromise [69].…”
Section: Mass Spectrometry (Ms)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results suggest that asphaltenes may be composed primarily of small molecules (less than ~2 kDa) with highly condensed aromatic ring systems [77]. In order to investigate deeply the effects of ionization source and mass analyzer, some authors [73,78,79] compared Laser Desorption/Ionization-Time of Flight mass spectrometry (LDI-TOFMS) with APPI-MS for asphaltenes analysis. Both the MS spectra (reported in Figures 5 and 6) of asphaltenes, obtained with the two techniques, present similar MW range with a broad structure extending in the range m/z 300-1100 (the peaks around m/z 200, in the case of APPI-MS spectrum, are due to toluene) with peaks periodicities of 1 (peaks at every nominal mass), 2 and 14 units, indicating the presence of homologues with different unsaturation degrees [65].…”
Section: Mass Spectrometry (Ms)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation