2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization, treatment and outcomes of salivary ductal carcinoma using the National Cancer Database

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
75
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
7
75
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A larger retrospective evaluation of 495 patients with SDC listed in the National Cancer Database indicated that surgical resection was superior to all other modalities, with insufficient data available to properly evaluate the role of conventional or targeted chemotherapies. 7 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A larger retrospective evaluation of 495 patients with SDC listed in the National Cancer Database indicated that surgical resection was superior to all other modalities, with insufficient data available to properly evaluate the role of conventional or targeted chemotherapies. 7 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the SEER database analysis, the authors found that increasing age, late stage, and N+ disease were associated with OS in multivariable analysis [19]. Similarly, a recent NCDB analysis showed that increasing age, male sex, and Stage IV disease were significant predictors of worse OS in a multivariable Cox regression model [38]. …”
Section: Outcomes: Survival and Prognostic Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T3 or T4), with figures ranging from 35–74% [2, 4–7, 9, 11, 12, 14, 15, 18, 22, 31–38]. Two separate National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) studies, each with over 400 patients, found that 40–42% of patients presented with advanced T stage [36, 38]. However, analyses of multi-institutional data in Japan revealed an advanced T stage incidence of 65–66% [35, 37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations