2016
DOI: 10.1007/s13226-016-0174-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizations of symmetrized polydisc

Abstract: Let Γ n , n ≥ 2, denote the symmetrized polydisc in C n , and Γ 1 be the closed unit disc in C. We provide some characterizations of elements in Γ n . In particular, an element (s 1 , . . . , s n−1 , p) ∈ C n is in Γ n if and only if s

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…He established that a distributive lattice A with 0 is normal iff for all x, y ∈ A, x ∧ y = 0 implies x ⊥ and y ⊥ are comaximal. Pawar [4] characterized normal lattices using the properties of Stone space of prime filters and the Stone space of maximal filters of a bounded distributive lattice. In 1977, Pawar and Thakare [5] introduced pm-lattices as bounded distributive lattices where each prime ideal is uniquely contained within a maximal ideal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He established that a distributive lattice A with 0 is normal iff for all x, y ∈ A, x ∧ y = 0 implies x ⊥ and y ⊥ are comaximal. Pawar [4] characterized normal lattices using the properties of Stone space of prime filters and the Stone space of maximal filters of a bounded distributive lattice. In 1977, Pawar and Thakare [5] introduced pm-lattices as bounded distributive lattices where each prime ideal is uniquely contained within a maximal ideal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal of this paper is to extend the theory of Toeplitz operators in the Hardy space setting to another domain in C d , d ≥ 2, viz., the symmetrized polydisk. This polynomially convex but not convex domain has attracted a considerable amount of attention for its complex geometry [19,17,24,25,23], function theory [22,26,31], and operator theory [10]. To describe the domain, we consider the elementary symmetric functions s i : C d → C of degree i in d variables defined as s 0 := 1 and s i (z) :=…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%