2009
DOI: 10.1152/ajprenal.90736.2008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizations of urinary sediments precipitated after freezing and their effects on urinary protein and chemical analyses

Abstract: One of the obstacles in analyzing frozen urine samples is the formation of uncharacterized precipitates. Frequently, these precipitates are discarded before analysis. Some laboratory data may be erroneous if these precipitates contain important compounds. In the present study, we examined urinary sediments precipitated after overnight storage at -20 degrees C. Although cells and debris were removed before freezing, the precipitates remained, whereas storing the centrifuged urine overnight at 4 degrees C did no… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite considerable efforts to extract gDNA from urine sediments, traditional gDNA extraction methods are easily contaminated by various known enzyme inhibitors (phenol, urea and salts) originating from the urine and/or extraction process. Consequently, it would be necessary to re-dissolve the sediment prior to cell isolation, as adopted by protocols assaying other urine components (e.g., proteins) [26]. Despite reports that incubating urine samples at high temperatures [9] or room temperature with vigorous agitation [26] could re-dissolve the sediments, these approaches were unsatisfactory in our experience, particularly when the urine samples had a high sediment content.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite considerable efforts to extract gDNA from urine sediments, traditional gDNA extraction methods are easily contaminated by various known enzyme inhibitors (phenol, urea and salts) originating from the urine and/or extraction process. Consequently, it would be necessary to re-dissolve the sediment prior to cell isolation, as adopted by protocols assaying other urine components (e.g., proteins) [26]. Despite reports that incubating urine samples at high temperatures [9] or room temperature with vigorous agitation [26] could re-dissolve the sediments, these approaches were unsatisfactory in our experience, particularly when the urine samples had a high sediment content.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The urine used in this study however, was freshly prepared, but in many applications, urine samples need to be stored at low temperatures before processing. Low temperature storage is problematic as sediment may form within the urine, particularly under frozen conditions [26], which contains many physiological metabolites that may inhibit enzymes if not removed completely. The presence of sediment also strongly interferes with urine cell gDNA recovery using magnetic particles as solid-phase adsorbents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since these studies were carried out in two hospitals where laboratory facilities are limited, we were not able to examine for oxalate crystals in the urine samples immediately after collection. It is not valid to examine crystals in thawed stored samples [63].…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Urine bio-specimens stored at low temperature (-20 to -80°C) are known to form a precipitate (mainly composed of calcium oxalate dihydrate) after thawing to room temperature (Saetun et al 2009). In addition to calcium ions, these precipitates have been shown to deplete urinary proteins during storage at -20°C in as short as 12 h (Vittinghus 1990).…”
Section: Sample Collection and Pre-treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%