2010
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/200912948
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing black hole variability with nonlinear methods: the case of the X-ray Nova 4U 1543–47

Abstract: Aims.We investigate the possible nonlinear variability properties of the black hole X-ray nova 4U 1543-47 with a dual goal: 1) to complement the temporal studies based on linear techniques, and 2) to search for signs of (deterministic and stochastic) nonlinearity in Galactic black hole (GBH) light curves. The proposed analysis may provide additional model-independent constraints to shed light on black hole systems and may strengthen the unification between GBHs and active galactic nuclei (AGN). Methods. First,… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 1 Wu et al (2010); 2 Deegan et al (2009); 3 Taam et al (1997); 4 Revnivtsev et al (2000); 5 Homan et al (2001); 6 Tanaka & Shibazaki (1996); 7 van der Hooft et al (1999); 8 Harmon et al (1995); 9 Gliozzi et al (2010); 10 in't Zand et al (1992); 11 Trudolyubov et al (1996); 12 Motta, Munoz‐Darias & Belloni (2010); 13 Garcia et al (2010); 14 Esin et al (2000); 15 Cadolle Bel et al (2009); 16 Corbel et al (2004); 17 Soleri et al (2008); 18 Tomsick et al (2003); 19 Belloni et al (2000); 20 Kitamoto et al (1990); 21 Casares et al (2004); 22 Sobczak et al (2000); 23 Hynes et al (2003); 24 Miller et al 2004; 25 Shrader et al (1997); 26 van Paradijs (1996); 27 Kolb et al (1997); 28 Buxton & Bailyn (2004) 29 Życki, Done & Smith (1997); 30 Życki et al (1999); 31 Zhang et al (2007); 32 Greiner et al (1994); 33 Brocksopp et al (2001); 34 Cui et al (1999); 35 Sobczak et al (1999). …”
Section: Observational Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 1 Wu et al (2010); 2 Deegan et al (2009); 3 Taam et al (1997); 4 Revnivtsev et al (2000); 5 Homan et al (2001); 6 Tanaka & Shibazaki (1996); 7 van der Hooft et al (1999); 8 Harmon et al (1995); 9 Gliozzi et al (2010); 10 in't Zand et al (1992); 11 Trudolyubov et al (1996); 12 Motta, Munoz‐Darias & Belloni (2010); 13 Garcia et al (2010); 14 Esin et al (2000); 15 Cadolle Bel et al (2009); 16 Corbel et al (2004); 17 Soleri et al (2008); 18 Tomsick et al (2003); 19 Belloni et al (2000); 20 Kitamoto et al (1990); 21 Casares et al (2004); 22 Sobczak et al (2000); 23 Hynes et al (2003); 24 Miller et al 2004; 25 Shrader et al (1997); 26 van Paradijs (1996); 27 Kolb et al (1997); 28 Buxton & Bailyn (2004) 29 Życki, Done & Smith (1997); 30 Życki et al (1999); 31 Zhang et al (2007); 32 Greiner et al (1994); 33 Brocksopp et al (2001); 34 Cui et al (1999); 35 Sobczak et al (1999). …”
Section: Observational Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonlinearity thus refers to all those structures in data sets that are not captured by the power spectrum. Since its introduction the method of surrogates has found numerous applications in many fields of research ranging from geophysical and physiological time series analysis [2] to econophysics [3], astrophysics [4], and cosmology [5,6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It appears that in the absence of a hard surface, the standing shock itself behaves like a hard surface and its oscillation changes the size of the post‐shock region significantly. This could be the cause of the low and intermediate frequency quasi‐periodic oscillations (Chakrabarti & Manickam 2000; Rodriguez et al 2004; Remillard & McClintock 2006; Gliozzi et al 2010; Qu et al 2010). When the viscosity is increased, the Keplerian rate is enhanced and at the same time, the shock recedes to a large distance and the time period is increased.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%