2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2212.08873
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing collective physical distancing in the U.S. during the first nine months of the COVID-19 pandemic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…During the reopening phase, we found that mobility quickly rebounded within the first week (although it did not return to the pre-outbreak level). This recovering trend is substantially different from some European and US locations where the rebound was much slower, possibly due to the persistence of the epidemic or different levels of lockdown fatigue ( 12 , 17 , 24 , 25 ). Within the Shanghai population, we found a slower mobility recovery during reopening among older adults (70+ y), which suggests possible spontaneous choices to limit mobility to minimize the risk of infection given widespread information about the increased risk of developing severe symptoms by age if infected.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…During the reopening phase, we found that mobility quickly rebounded within the first week (although it did not return to the pre-outbreak level). This recovering trend is substantially different from some European and US locations where the rebound was much slower, possibly due to the persistence of the epidemic or different levels of lockdown fatigue ( 12 , 17 , 24 , 25 ). Within the Shanghai population, we found a slower mobility recovery during reopening among older adults (70+ y), which suggests possible spontaneous choices to limit mobility to minimize the risk of infection given widespread information about the increased risk of developing severe symptoms by age if infected.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…During the reopening phase, we found that mobility quickly rebounded within the first week (although it did not return to the pre-outbreak level). This recovering trend is substantially different from some European and US locations where the rebound was much slower, possibly due to the persistence of the epidemic or different levels of lockdown fatigue (12,17,21,22). Within the Shanghai population, we found a slower mobility recovery during reopening among older adults (70+ years), which suggests possible spontaneous choices to limit mobility to minimize the risk of infection given widespread information about the increased risk of developing severe symptoms by age if infected.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…We also characterize the shift that occurred in the baseline patterns of indoor activity seasonality during the COVID-19 pandemic. We note that this seasonal variation in the propensity of human activity to be indoors differs from the variation in overall rates of contact or mobility, which does not appear to be highly seasonal (Figure 1—figure supplement 1, [38]). Lastly, we fit non-linear models to the indoor activity metric at baseline, comparing the ability of a simple model to capture seasonal variation in transmission risk.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%