2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.0c04662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing Ensembles of Platelike Particles via Machine Learning

Abstract: The size and shape characterization of platelike particles using a dual projection imaging device is presented. Based on the published algorithm to estimate the three lengths of the particles from the image pairs (method 1), the average error on the shortest length is around 140% on a test set of particles with different sizes, shapes, and alignment. Therefore, two potential improvements are tested in a simulation setting. The first approach uses an additional projection coupled with an oriented bounding box t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the presented algorithm is very effective for needle-like particles, it is indeed specialized and limited to separating and sizing such objects and would perform poorly on objects that are not defined by two parallel edges, e.g., round overlapping objects or objects with entirely different characteristics. One avenue to resolve this would be to develop further branches of methodology that could be used to deal with non needle-like morphologies along with a pre-classification step to decide which algorithm to use on the shapes at hand, as other authors have shown previously [25,26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While the presented algorithm is very effective for needle-like particles, it is indeed specialized and limited to separating and sizing such objects and would perform poorly on objects that are not defined by two parallel edges, e.g., round overlapping objects or objects with entirely different characteristics. One avenue to resolve this would be to develop further branches of methodology that could be used to deal with non needle-like morphologies along with a pre-classification step to decide which algorithm to use on the shapes at hand, as other authors have shown previously [25,26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data from one-dimensional techniques have been used for the derivation of two-dimensional PSSDs by assuming constant aspect ratios or narrow size distributions of the particles' width [12,14,19,20]. For a highly accurate description of anisotropic morphologies, however, imaging provides the best solution since it allows for direct measurement of the length and width of particles [21,22] and even for a reconstruction of three-dimensional shapes from dual projections [23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is attributed to the effect of particle orientation, which is further elucidated through simulations. [40] Visually, the different outputs of the two methods can be appreciated by means of violin plots, shown on the right-handside of panels (a), (b), and (c) of Figure 3. Violin plots are useful graphical tools to display the density distributions in a compact fashion, thus allowing a rapid comparison among distributions.…”
Section: Comparison Between the Obb Methods And ML Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, the goals of the current study are twofold: (a)to show how monodisperse populations of arbitrarily shaped micrometer‐sized cuboidal particles can be fabricated by photolithography and employed as novel analytical standards; (b)to experimentally demonstrate how a multiprojection imaging device [ 39 ] coupled with a machine learning (ML) algorithm [ 40 ] is able to yield online and accurate estimates of the three characteristic lengths of such cuboidal particles in suspension. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they either still deal with dilute slurries with a low solid density and limited object overlap in the captured images or rely on external loops to generate analyzable images. Neural networks as regression models are also used for shape characterization of plate-like crystals based on dual-projection images 28 or to extract information about solution and solid-phase concentrations from Raman and IR spectra in different crystallization processes. 29,30 In the present work, we develop a computer vision model, based on CNNs, that can be combined with high-throughput in situ imaging using a PVM probe for live monitoring of crystallization processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%