2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.envc.2021.100151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing forest ecosystem services degradation within water catchments. An application to a South West Pacific tropical and semi-arid island (New Caledonia)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The total and individual values of ecosystem services are negatively related to population growth and the loss of cropland expansion (Berihun et al, 2021). The clearing of natural forests and shrub ecosystems has reduced the quality and stability of water flows, carbon stocks, soil stabilization, and wild pollination services (Eguiguren et al, 2019; van Haaren et al, 2019). The total ecosystem service value of natural and shrub forests is significantly higher than that of plantations (Bremer & Farley, 2010; Chazdon, 2008; Paudyal et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total and individual values of ecosystem services are negatively related to population growth and the loss of cropland expansion (Berihun et al, 2021). The clearing of natural forests and shrub ecosystems has reduced the quality and stability of water flows, carbon stocks, soil stabilization, and wild pollination services (Eguiguren et al, 2019; van Haaren et al, 2019). The total ecosystem service value of natural and shrub forests is significantly higher than that of plantations (Bremer & Farley, 2010; Chazdon, 2008; Paudyal et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include regulating services such as water quality and quantity (DellaSala, 2011;Brandt et al, 2014;Keith et al, 2017;Kormos et al, 2018;Taylor et al, 2019;Vardon et al, 2019); carbon storage and sequestration as an ecosystem service of global climate regulation (United Nations [UN], 2021) [discussed above, but see Keith et al (2019) and Uganda Bureau of Statistics [UBOS] ( 2020) for examples using Ecosystem Accounts]; local to regional biophysical cooling (Spracklen et al, 2012;Lawrence and Vandecar, 2015); regulation of runoff, sediment retention, erosion control, and flood mitigation (Hornbeck and Federer, 1975;Jayasuriya et al, 1993;Dudley and Stolton, 2003;Furniss et al, 2010;van Haaren et al, 2021); provisioning services such as abundance of game and fish (Gamfeldt et al, 2013;Brandt et al, 2014); cultural services such as landscape aesthetics, recreation, and tourism (Brandt et al, 2014;Brockerhoff et al, 2017); cultural practices and knowledge (Normyle et al, 2022); contributions to physical and psychological health (Stier-Jarmer et al, 2021); and general assessments across a suite of services (e.g., Myers, 1997;Harrison et al, 2014;Shimamoto et al, 2018;Maes et al, 2020).…”
Section: Comparison Of Ecosystem Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%