2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-94004-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing intra-tumor regions on quantitative ultrasound parametric images to predict breast cancer response to chemotherapy at pre-treatment

Abstract: The efficacy of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) multi-parametric imaging in conjunction with unsupervised classification algorithms was investigated for the first time in characterizing intra-tumor regions to predict breast tumor response to chemotherapy before the start of treatment. QUS multi-parametric images of breast tumors were generated using the ultrasound radiofrequency data acquired from 181 patients diagnosed with locally advanced breast cancer and planned for neo-adjuvant chemotherapy followed by sur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A board-certified pathologist who remained blinded to the study results examined all pathology samples. A modified response (MR) grading system based on response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) 48 and histopathological criteria 38 , 49 was used to categorize the patients into two groups of responders and non-responders, as before 50 . In the MR grading system, the MR score is defined as follows: MR 1: no reduction in tumor size; MR 2: less than 30% reduction in tumor size; MR 3: between 30 and 90% reduction in tumor size or a very low residual tumor cellularity determined histopathologically; MR 4: more than 90% reduction in tumor; MR 5: no evident tumor and no malignant cells identifiable in sections from the site of the tumor (ductal carcinoma in situ may be present).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A board-certified pathologist who remained blinded to the study results examined all pathology samples. A modified response (MR) grading system based on response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) 48 and histopathological criteria 38 , 49 was used to categorize the patients into two groups of responders and non-responders, as before 50 . In the MR grading system, the MR score is defined as follows: MR 1: no reduction in tumor size; MR 2: less than 30% reduction in tumor size; MR 3: between 30 and 90% reduction in tumor size or a very low residual tumor cellularity determined histopathologically; MR 4: more than 90% reduction in tumor; MR 5: no evident tumor and no malignant cells identifiable in sections from the site of the tumor (ductal carcinoma in situ may be present).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the effectiveness of NAC, the above-mentioned pilot studies used the mean values of biomarkers determined for the entire mass of the tumor. The analysis of tumor changes due to chemotherapy may suggest that this is not always the best method (21) . Mean values represent global changes that may mask subtle remodeling of the tissue microstructure, especially at the beginning of therapy.…”
Section: Determination Methods Parameter Name and Definition Tissue F...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique can detect tumor cell death in response to chemotherapy and, in addition, could predict response to NAC after one-to-four weeks of chemotherapy [ 109 , 110 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 ]. Recently, Taleghamar et al acquired multiple parametric images with QUS from 181 locally advanced breast cancer patients before NAC [ 115 ]. After creating a QUS signature composed of four specific features from intratumoral regions, they could predict response to NAC with a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 85%.…”
Section: Predictive Biomarkers Under Investigationmentioning
confidence: 99%