2021
DOI: 10.3390/nu13041237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing Micronutrient Status and Risk Factors among Late Adolescent and Young Women in Rural Pakistan: A Cross-Sectional Assessment of the MaPPS Trial

Abstract: Nutritional deficiencies are a leading underlying risk factor contributing to the global burden of disease. In Pakistan, late adolescence is considered a nutritionally vulnerable period, as micronutrient requirements are increased to support maturation, and dietary staples are nutrient poor. However, there has been limited evaluation of micronutrient status beyond anemia and its determinants. Using cross-sectional data from late adolescent and young women (15–23 years) at enrolment in the Matiari emPowerment a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other evidence has highlighted the benefits of MMN fortification and supplementation as compared with singlemicronutrient approaches (81) . The recent Lancet Series on Maternal and Child Undernutrition Progress highlighted the strong evidence supporting MMN supplementation during the antenatal period for improved birth outcomes and suggested the potential benefit of extending this into the preconception period for adolescent girls and young women in high-burden contexts (82)(83)(84) . Current WHO guidelines recommend daily Fe-only or weekly Fe and folic acid supplementation in menstruating, non-pregnant women and adolescents, depending on the anaemia burden (82,83,85) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other evidence has highlighted the benefits of MMN fortification and supplementation as compared with singlemicronutrient approaches (81) . The recent Lancet Series on Maternal and Child Undernutrition Progress highlighted the strong evidence supporting MMN supplementation during the antenatal period for improved birth outcomes and suggested the potential benefit of extending this into the preconception period for adolescent girls and young women in high-burden contexts (82)(83)(84) . Current WHO guidelines recommend daily Fe-only or weekly Fe and folic acid supplementation in menstruating, non-pregnant women and adolescents, depending on the anaemia burden (82,83,85) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent Lancet Series on Maternal and Child Undernutrition Progress highlighted the strong evidence supporting MMN supplementation during the antenatal period for improved birth outcomes and suggested the potential benefit of extending this into the preconception period for adolescent girls and young women in high-burden contexts (82)(83)(84) . Current WHO guidelines recommend daily Fe-only or weekly Fe and folic acid supplementation in menstruating, non-pregnant women and adolescents, depending on the anaemia burden (82,83,85) . However, evidence is lacking on implementation strategies to examine the acceptability and effectiveness of supplementation dose, delivery and duration, either for these guidelines or for MMN approaches (8) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We previously developed a conceptual framework to serve as an overarching guide for understanding how SDN can affect the various components that underlie nutritional status among adolescent girls and the downstream consequences ( Appendix S1 ) (Baxter et al, 2021 ). The structure was adapted from the UNICEF conceptual framework on the causes of malnutrition and informed by the WHO Commission on SDoH (Commission on Social Determinants of Health, 2008 ; UNICEF, 1998 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We hypothesized that there were four levels of SDN explanatory variables: (1) socio‐economic status: education, occupation, religion and wealth quintile; (2) household and personal factors: household food security, marital status and parity; (3) health and well‐being: perception of own health, body image, experience of depression‐, anxiety‐ and stress‐like feelings; and (4) actions and practices: self‐efficacy, participation in decision‐making, skipping breakfast and eating dinner with family. For all analyses, the reference for each variable was set as the category at which someone would be likely to experience the greatest nutritional vulnerability (Baxter et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on an observed food insecurity prevalence of 31.1% in Matiari, and using a simple asymptotic formula, a sample size of 224 villages was required to produce estimates at 5% precision and 95% level of confidence ( Table 2 ). A listing of all villages ( N = 585) in the district was generated by a previous intervention trial [ 30 ]. The present study used a random number generator to select villages from this list, and this was further stratified by village size (based on population percentiles, Figure 1 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%