2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2018.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing mineral wettabilities on a microscale by colloidal probe atomic force microscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To wipe out any potential contaminations on the mineral surface, samples were then washed up triple with Milli-Q water and blowdried with pressurized air. Detailed information regarding the sample predation and measurement approach was noted elsewhere [47]. The Young-Laplace equation was fitted to calculate the contact angles [48].…”
Section: Contact Angle Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To wipe out any potential contaminations on the mineral surface, samples were then washed up triple with Milli-Q water and blowdried with pressurized air. Detailed information regarding the sample predation and measurement approach was noted elsewhere [47]. The Young-Laplace equation was fitted to calculate the contact angles [48].…”
Section: Contact Angle Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The liquid cell was lled by injecting up to 750 mL of collector, water or depressant solution using a clean disposable plastic nozzle attached to a pipette. The same clean disposable plastic nozzles have previously been used by Babel and Rudolph, 11 with plastic nozzles also being used in other studies. 19,20 The liquid was then heated to between 20 C and 30 C for nanobubble measurements in a temperature controlled room of 21 C AE 1 C. Between measurements the cantilever was cleaned by washing in distilled water then ethanol and again distilled water.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Surface nanobubbles are smaller, but have longer lifetimes than their bulk counterparts, and can be formed using electrolysis, to ethanol and water exchange, gas supersaturation and microwaves. [4][5][6][7] Surface nanobubbles have been shown to form on a wide range of surfaces, ranging from pyrolytic graphite graphene to chalcopyrite and galena, [8][9][10][11] and as well as being relevant to the understanding of colloids and surfaces, nanobubbles are thought to play an import role in processes ranging from cancer treatment to decompression sickness. 12,13 Predicting and controlling the size and location of nanobubbles is therefore of interest to a wide range of elds, 14 including in mineral processing, where bulk nanobubbles have been iden-tied as improving the efficiency in otation systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to the volume of the bulk CCP, it appears unlikely that the resin could reach the center area of the rock during embedding where the AFM measurements were carried out. Previous studies with a similar sample preparation did not reveal any influence of the epoxy [44,45]. However, a contamination of the CCP surface with the hardened epoxy polymer during embedding and polishing cannot be completely ruled out.…”
Section: Materials and Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 76%