2016
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.93.214514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizingp-wave superconductivity using the spin structure of Shiba states

Abstract: Cooper pairs in two-dimensional unconventional superconductors with broken inversion symmetry are in a mixture of an even-parity spin-singlet pairing state with an odd-parity spin-triplet pairing state. We study the magnetic properties of the impurity bound states in such superconductors and find striking signatures in their spin polarization which allow to unambiguously discriminate a nontopological superconducting phase from a topological one. Moreover, we show how these properties, which could be measured u… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
41
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
6
41
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to broken in-plane reflection symmetry in the quasi-two-dimensional plane, but conserved out-of-plane mirror symmetry, the spin-orbit coupling favors a spin alignment normal to the monolayer for electrons at the Fermi surface in K valleys, which leads to robust superconductivity to in-plane magnetic fields. This is different from most cases studied before [33][34][35][36][37] where spin-orbit coupling is Rashba type, which favors in-plane orientation of spins. For the latter, the depairing effect of in-plane magnetic fields is large, rendering problematic the manipulation of MBS with magnetic fields.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to broken in-plane reflection symmetry in the quasi-two-dimensional plane, but conserved out-of-plane mirror symmetry, the spin-orbit coupling favors a spin alignment normal to the monolayer for electrons at the Fermi surface in K valleys, which leads to robust superconductivity to in-plane magnetic fields. This is different from most cases studied before [33][34][35][36][37] where spin-orbit coupling is Rashba type, which favors in-plane orientation of spins. For the latter, the depairing effect of in-plane magnetic fields is large, rendering problematic the manipulation of MBS with magnetic fields.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…[25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] Alternatively, the superconductors have a strong spin-orbit coupling, which allows ferro-and antiferromagnetic chains of impurities to exhibit MBS at the edges. [33][34][35][36][37] In this second scenario, the inversion symmetry is broken in the superconductor and the order parameter becomes a mixture of singlet and triplet pairing, [38][39][40][41] with the latter essential to generate effective p-wave superconductivity in the chains. Since the helical configuration of impurity spins proved harder to stabi- lize in experiments, the first detection of MBS from YSR states has followed the second avenue by employing chains of Fe atoms deposited on superconducting Pb.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total Hamiltonian consists of the sum H = H (bulk) + H (imp) . Each potential impurity atom binds a single physical subgap state [42][43][44], which in the BdG formalism is represented by a pair of states at energies ε = ± where v F is the Fermi velocity and ν the density of states in the bulk [45].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case potential-impurity-induced bound states exist [42] and phase winding is inherited to the effective low-energy model. Such (s + p)-wave structure is satisfied in the artificial chiral superconductor realized in 2D Rashbacoupled semiconductors sandwiched by an s-wave superconductor and a ferromagnetic insulator [47] at sufficiently strong magnetization.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, and the Bogliubov-de Gennes formalism of the Hamiltonian without disorder, see equations (12)- (14) for detailed expressions, one can find that, the SP LDOS can be written as follows after some straightforward derivation [52][53][54],…”
Section: Model Hamiltonian and Sp Ldosmentioning
confidence: 99%