2020
DOI: 10.3389/fphy.2020.550458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing Radiation Effectiveness in Ion-Beam Therapy Part II: Microdosimetric Detectors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dose‐mean lineal energy values are useful parameters for characterizing radiation quality. The differences and the correlations between lienal energy and LET quantities are thoroughly described in the literature 15,56 . The values of y¯d0.33em${\bar{y}_d}\ $and LET do not coincide but their comparison is a common practice which must be seen as a practical way to show a general trend of the radiation quality at different depths expressed by experimental (lineal energy) and computational (LET) quantities.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The dose‐mean lineal energy values are useful parameters for characterizing radiation quality. The differences and the correlations between lienal energy and LET quantities are thoroughly described in the literature 15,56 . The values of y¯d0.33em${\bar{y}_d}\ $and LET do not coincide but their comparison is a common practice which must be seen as a practical way to show a general trend of the radiation quality at different depths expressed by experimental (lineal energy) and computational (LET) quantities.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences and the correlations between lienal energy and LET quantities are thoroughly described in the literature. 15,56 The values of ȳd and LET do not coincide but their comparison is a common practice which must be seen as a practical way to show a general trend of the radiation quality at different depths expressed by experimental (lineal energy) and computational (LET) quantities. The dose averaged LET values (LET d ) in water, calculated by means of GATE Monte Carlo simulation (see Section 2.4), are also reported in Figure 8 for both proton and carbon ion beams.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Such fluctuations can lead to lower absorption of the actual dose by some tumor cells or increase the incidence of complications in normal tissues during radiotherapy (Brahme 1984, Lindborg andBrahme 1990). Therefore, many studies have introduced microdosimetry theory to explore the microscopic distribution of the interaction between radiation and sensitive targets (Colautti et al 2020, Scholz et al 2020. In microdosimetry, the specific energy z is defined as the imparted energy e per unit mass m reflecting the actual energy in a given microscopic target at a consistent level of absorbed dose, D. ( ) f z D , is the probability density function of the specific energy in a microscopic volume, representing the microdosimetric distribution of energy at the absorbed dose D in the macroscopic region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%