1998
DOI: 10.2307/2999630
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing Selection Bias Using Experimental Data

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.Semiparametric methods are developed to estimate the bias that arises from using nonexperimental comparison groups to evaluate social programs and to test the identifying assump… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
883
1
22

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,795 publications
(915 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
9
883
1
22
Order By: Relevance
“…The PSM also assumes conditional independence and the presence of a reasonable overlap of propensity scores (common support) (Winters et al, 2010). The method is intuitively attractive as it helps in comparing the observed outcomes of treated with the outcomes of the counterfactual control group (Heckman et al, 1998). It helps to evaluate programs that require longitudinal datasets using single cross-sectional dataset where the former does not exist.…”
Section: Propensity Score Matching Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The PSM also assumes conditional independence and the presence of a reasonable overlap of propensity scores (common support) (Winters et al, 2010). The method is intuitively attractive as it helps in comparing the observed outcomes of treated with the outcomes of the counterfactual control group (Heckman et al, 1998). It helps to evaluate programs that require longitudinal datasets using single cross-sectional dataset where the former does not exist.…”
Section: Propensity Score Matching Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite its advantages, it requires enough data that must be available or feasible to produce experimental treatment effect results. The PSM method basically matches observations of participant and non-participant farmers according to their predicted propensity of participation in AVCMP (Rosebaum & Rubin, 1983;Heckman et al, 1998;Smith & Todd, 2005;Wooldridge, 2005). In the first step, the conditional probability of participation (propensity score) is estimated using the Probit model by controlling for observed household characteristics.…”
Section: Propensity Score Matching Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers suggest that covariates that affect both intervention participation and outcomes should be included in the estimation of the propensity score (Caliendo & Kopeinig, 2008;Heckman, Ichimura, Smith, & Todd, 1998;Lechner, 2002;Ravallion, 2001). Covariates included in this study were derived from correlates of college enrollment and transition planning participation that have been cited in the literature described above: youth's gender, age, race/ethnicity, disability severity, high school achievement, family income, mother's education level, whether parents ever enrolled in a postsecondary school/program, and parents' expectation of youth attending college.…”
Section: Covariatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[...] Thus the choice of an appropriate econometric model critically depends on the data on which it is applied" (Heckman et al 1998b). …”
Section: Mergingmentioning
confidence: 99%