Characterizing standard genetic parts and establishing common principles for engineering legume and cereal roots

Abstract

SummaryPlant synthetic biology and cereal engineering depend on the controlled expression of transgenes of interest. Most engineering in plant species to date has relied heavily on the use of a few, well‐established constitutive promoters to achieve high levels of expression; however, the levels of transgene expression can also be influenced by the use of codon optimization, intron‐mediated enhancement and varying terminator sequences. Most of these alternative approaches for regulating transgene expression have only been tested in small‐scale experiments, typically testing a single gene of interest. It is therefore difficult to interpret the relative importance of these approaches and to design engineering strategies that are likely to succeed in different plant species, particularly if engineering multigenic traits where the expression of each transgene needs to be precisely regulated. Here, we present data on the characterization of 46 promoters and 10 terminators in Medicago truncatula, Lotus japonicus, Nicotiana benthamiana and Hordeum vulgare, as well as the effects of codon optimization and intron‐mediated enhancement on the expression of two transgenes in H. vulgare. We have identified a core set of promoters and terminators of relevance to researchers engineering novel traits in plant roots. In addition, we have shown that combining codon optimization and intron‐mediated enhancement increases transgene expression and protein levels in barley. Based on our study, we recommend a core set of promoters and terminators for broad use and also propose a general set of principles and guidelines for those engineering cereal species.

Turning Up the Temperature on CRISPR: Increased Temperature Can Improve the Editing Efficiency of Wheat Using CRISPR/Cas9

“…The choice of promoter driving the Cas9 itself needs to be considered carefully as higher editing rates in wheat have been seen in plants with ZmUbi driving the Cas9, than with OsActin. There is some evidence that, in plants including work here (Figure 1), ubiquitin does show much higher expression than that of actin promoters (Feike et al, 2019;Kishi-Kaboshi et al, 2019). Whether this holds true for all tissues still needs to be determined as in Arabidopsis promoters which express the Cas9 in different tissues have increased the heritability of mutations (Yan et al, 2015).…”

30 years of free‐air carbon dioxide enrichment (FACE): What have we learned about future crop productivity and its potential for adaptation?

“…This could be realized if N 2 fixation could be engineered into cereals and other nonleguminous crops, along with increased capacity to form mycorrhizal associations. Once far‐fetched, recent rapid advances in understanding of the molecular biology of these related plant–microbe interactions show that these goals could be achieved in the not‐too‐distant future (Bailey‐Serres et al., 2019; Feike et al., 2019; Feng et al., 2019; Mus et al., 2016; Zipfel & Oldroyd, 2017).…”

The Rooting of Stem Cuttings and the Stability of uidA Gene Expression in Generative and Vegetative Progeny of Transgenic Pear Rootstock in the Field

“…Although IME has been known on plants for more than 30 years, the mechanism of IME is largely unknown, due to the complexity of this phenomenon both on the regulatory level and on the level of its action [61]. Studies on IME are conducted mainly on model plants [63] or monocots [64], but there are almost no reports on trees.…”