2010
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/12/2/025010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterizing symmetries in a projected entangled pair state

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
59
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the transfer operator has itself a Matrix Product structure, any symmetry of the transfer operator must be encoded locally, i.e., it will show up as a symmetry of the singlesite ket+bra object shown in Fig. 5a [30]. There can be two distinct types of such symmetries: Those which act identically on ket and bra layer, shown in Fig.…”
Section: B the Assumption: Matrix Product Fixed Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the transfer operator has itself a Matrix Product structure, any symmetry of the transfer operator must be encoded locally, i.e., it will show up as a symmetry of the singlesite ket+bra object shown in Fig. 5a [30]. There can be two distinct types of such symmetries: Those which act identically on ket and bra layer, shown in Fig.…”
Section: B the Assumption: Matrix Product Fixed Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the special case of injective PEPS [6] the MPO P is simply the identity P = 1 1 (i.e. a MPO with bond dimension 1), the symmetry MPOs V (g) can always be factorized into a tensor product of local gauge transformations [41] and the ground state is unique.…”
Section: Global Symmetry In Pepsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of translational invariant systems, the state is described by a single local tensor, and understanding any property of the system can be mapped to studying a corresponding property of this tensor. In this way, PEPS have been very successful in understanding otherwise intractable questions, such as the characterization of topological order from local symmetries, 4 the way in which global symmetries emerge locally, 5 or the characterization of quantum phases without and with symmetries in one dimension [6][7][8] and beyond, 9 just to name a few. To assess how general these results are, it is therefore important to identify the conditions under which PEPS are robust to perturbations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%